2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue properties of AlSi10Mg produced by Additive Layer Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is of upmost importance to investigate and understand the fracture mechanisms and fatigue characteristics, to assess properly, as well as safely the material qualifications. It is crucial to take account of the interaction between the microstructure, internal defects, and fatigue resistance [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is of upmost importance to investigate and understand the fracture mechanisms and fatigue characteristics, to assess properly, as well as safely the material qualifications. It is crucial to take account of the interaction between the microstructure, internal defects, and fatigue resistance [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among Al alloys, the most widely used and investigated is AlSi10Mg alloy, that shows interesting mechanical properties, in both as-fabricated and heat treated conditions [21][22][23][24][25][26], as well as good corrosion resistance [27][28][29]. Since during their life many parts undergo cycling loading conditions, several authors investigated also the fatigue behavior of this alloy in various conditions, evaluating the effect of fabrication direction or laser scanning strategy [26,[30][31][32]. AM products, in Al alloys as well as in other metals, can suffer from defects like porosity, residual stress and poor finishing that can negatively affect their performance [33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both productions were submitted to stress relaxation heat treatments. P2 bars were heat treated during 1 h at 210°C whereas P1 production was maintained at 300 °C during 2 h. At the end of these heat treatments, both productions respect the standard NF EN 1706:2010, exhibiting the same chemical composition given in Table 1 [13]. P2 production contains flaws in the form of pores that lead to 2.25 % of porosity, while P1 bars are 0.89 % porous.…”
Section: Sample Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%