2001
DOI: 10.1109/20.951048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue dependence of residual magnetization in austenitic stainless steel plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used 100 MPa, 110 MPa, 115 MPa, 120 MPa, and 125 MPa as a value of � a . When stress is the plane bending stress, fatigue of metal such as austenitic stainless steels progresses even if applied stress is below the fatigue limit [8,9]. Therefore, 100 MPa was used as one of � a .…”
Section: S-n Curve Of the Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 100 MPa, 110 MPa, 115 MPa, 120 MPa, and 125 MPa as a value of � a . When stress is the plane bending stress, fatigue of metal such as austenitic stainless steels progresses even if applied stress is below the fatigue limit [8,9]. Therefore, 100 MPa was used as one of � a .…”
Section: S-n Curve Of the Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One effective method is residual magnetization, using a thin-film flux-gate (FG) magnetic sensor [7]. This method which we used in a previous study clearly detected material degradation in austenitic stainless steels caused by plane-bending fatigue damage [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic characteristics of materials have been imaged by a variety of techniques, including conventional contact methods with sensitive magnetic field sensors, [1][2][3] electron microscopy techniques in which modification of electron motion by the Lorentz force is detected, 4 and optical methods which exploit the Kerr effect. 5 Scanning a surface with a sensitive magnetic field sensor provides direct information on the material surface, although it is generally difficult to maintain contact with rough surfaces and the technique is not suitable for environments subjected to magnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%