2012
DOI: 10.1520/jai103966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Behavior of A36 Steel using ASTM Load-Reduction and Compression Precracking Test Methods

Abstract: Eccentrically-loaded single-edge crack tension, ESE(T), specimens made of A36 structural steel were tested over a wide range in stress ratios (R=0.1 and 0.7) in laboratory air. Two test methods were used: (1) ASTM Standard E647 load-reduction method and (2) compression precracking. After compression precracking (CP), three different loading sequences were used: (1) constant amplitude (CPCA), (2) load reduction (CPLR), and (3) constant stress-intensity factor (CPCK). The crack-compliance method was used to dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of the analysis was to derive the stress intensity factor (K) solution and back-face strain relationships for the shortened version and compare them with the published solution for the full length ESE(T) specimen. 20 From these analyses, the compliance based crack length relation and stress intensity factor results for the shortened version were within 1% or less of the full length version equations. Thus, the existing equations for the full length specimen 20 were considered acceptable.…”
Section: Specimen and Test Detailsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The purpose of the analysis was to derive the stress intensity factor (K) solution and back-face strain relationships for the shortened version and compare them with the published solution for the full length ESE(T) specimen. 20 From these analyses, the compliance based crack length relation and stress intensity factor results for the shortened version were within 1% or less of the full length version equations. Thus, the existing equations for the full length specimen 20 were considered acceptable.…”
Section: Specimen and Test Detailsmentioning
confidence: 64%