1979
DOI: 10.7901/2169-3358-1979-1-675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate of Oil Spills on the Norwegian Continental Shelf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical observations are as follows: the mean velocity (current) at the sea surface is determined, not by a relationship between the applied wind stress and the vertical velocity gradient, mediated by a viscosity or turbulent eddy viscosity, but, instead, as a fraction λ ≈ 0.02 of the wind speed U. Thus, the value of the wind-induced surface current has a relatively stable behaviour, which is in agreement with the practical engineering calculations made in connection with observations of the drift of floating objects and of oil slicks, and the measurement of nearsurface currents using moored current meters and surface drifters (Audunson 1979;Huang 1979Huang , 1983Jenkins 1987a,b). Although the physical reason for this behaviour of the surface current may not be strictly evident, we may consider that an increasing wind stress will cause an increasing vertical velocity shear, but it will also cause an increase in turbulent motion which will transport momentum more rapidly downwards, thus decreasing the shear.…”
Section: Physical Basis Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The empirical observations are as follows: the mean velocity (current) at the sea surface is determined, not by a relationship between the applied wind stress and the vertical velocity gradient, mediated by a viscosity or turbulent eddy viscosity, but, instead, as a fraction λ ≈ 0.02 of the wind speed U. Thus, the value of the wind-induced surface current has a relatively stable behaviour, which is in agreement with the practical engineering calculations made in connection with observations of the drift of floating objects and of oil slicks, and the measurement of nearsurface currents using moored current meters and surface drifters (Audunson 1979;Huang 1979Huang , 1983Jenkins 1987a,b). Although the physical reason for this behaviour of the surface current may not be strictly evident, we may consider that an increasing wind stress will cause an increasing vertical velocity shear, but it will also cause an increase in turbulent motion which will transport momentum more rapidly downwards, thus decreasing the shear.…”
Section: Physical Basis Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In high seas when a slick is subject to continual turbulent stirring by wind shear and breaking waves, the oil may be rapidly dispersed into small drops 0.01 to 1.0 mm in diameter, which populate the subsurface layers. One common approach employed to describe this process is based on tabulations of dispersion as a function of sea state and elapsed time after oil release (Audunson 1979).…”
Section: The Horizontal and Vertical Diffusion Coefficients K mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user has two options for oil entrainment algorithms. The first is that proposed by Audunson 1 and modified by Spauldinget al ; 23 the second alternative algorithm is that proposed by Mackay et al (1980). The emulsification viscosity is allowed to increase for petroleum products according to a "mousse formation" algorithm, also from Mackay et al 14 Gasoline, kerosene, and light diesel fuel are assumed not to form emulsions with water.…”
Section: Oil Fate Concepts and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%