2016
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate of insecticidalBacillus thuringiensisCry protein in soil: differences between purified toxin and biopesticide formulation

Abstract: For the biopesticide, the observed decline in detectable protein was due to biological factors, possibly including the germination of B. thuringiensis spores, and was favoured by higher temperature. In contrast, for purified proteins, the decline in detectable protein was slower at low temperature, probably because the conformational changes of the soil-adsorbed protein, which cause fixation and hence reduced extraction efficiency, are temperature dependent. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these conditions, the protoxin form of Cry1A at 130kD was predominant and stable for at least 3 days before fading (control in Figure 6D, right part of the blot). This observation is in agreement with the fact that the half-life of Cry1A crystals has been estimated at about 1 week in soil or under laboratory conditions at 25°C (Hung et al, 2016). We used the same initial Btk SA11 spore preparation (0h) to feed the flies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Under these conditions, the protoxin form of Cry1A at 130kD was predominant and stable for at least 3 days before fading (control in Figure 6D, right part of the blot). This observation is in agreement with the fact that the half-life of Cry1A crystals has been estimated at about 1 week in soil or under laboratory conditions at 25°C (Hung et al, 2016). We used the same initial Btk SA11 spore preparation (0h) to feed the flies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Data also showed that almost all of the applied Btk formulation dose was still present on the leaves surface 72 h after spraying 28 , its amount returning close to environmental levels only 28 days after treatment 29 . Finally, Bt spores can survive in the soil and on different supports for months and even years after application [30][31][32][33] . Bt formulations contain also different compounds to protect spores and crystals and aggregate them into a wettable form, surfactants to facilitate spraying and dispersion on plants, and phagostimulants 34,35 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and SANCO/1543/08—rev. 4), knowing that the half-life of the entomopathogenic Cry1 toxins is estimated at ten days in the field [ 47 ]. Therefore, we decided to assess the impacts of the ingestion of two Btk bioinsecticides (i.e., Delfin and Dipel) on the growth and development of Drosophila larvae at two field-realistic concentrations: 5 × 10 6 CFU/g (corresponding to the concentration observed after one spraying) and 5 × 10 7 CFU/g (a concentration which could be reached upon repeated treatments), called hereafter “1X” and “10X”, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%