2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fastest Rapid Loading Methods of Vertical and Radial Consolidations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic criterion for "matching" methods is assumed to be the compatibility of the test with the theoretical solution. The following methods for determining the coefficient of consolidation were applied using the aforementioned criterion in the analysis: logarithm of time CA (Casagrande & Fadum 1940), inflection point IP (Mesri & Feng 1999), logarithmic LL (Sridharan & Prakash 1997), modified velocity (δ − logdδ/dt − VT 1 , δ − dδ/dt − VT 2 ) (Tewatia 1998, Tewatia et al 2013, Olek et al 2016. The verification tool for the calculated c v values was the approximation method in two variants: approximation course of strain (ACOS) and approximation course of pore pressure (ACOP) (Dobak & Pająk 2012, Dobak & Gaszyński 2014, whereby the course of the experiment is compared to the theoretical solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic criterion for "matching" methods is assumed to be the compatibility of the test with the theoretical solution. The following methods for determining the coefficient of consolidation were applied using the aforementioned criterion in the analysis: logarithm of time CA (Casagrande & Fadum 1940), inflection point IP (Mesri & Feng 1999), logarithmic LL (Sridharan & Prakash 1997), modified velocity (δ − logdδ/dt − VT 1 , δ − dδ/dt − VT 2 ) (Tewatia 1998, Tewatia et al 2013, Olek et al 2016. The verification tool for the calculated c v values was the approximation method in two variants: approximation course of strain (ACOS) and approximation course of pore pressure (ACOP) (Dobak & Pająk 2012, Dobak & Gaszyński 2014, whereby the course of the experiment is compared to the theoretical solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 60 % consolidation vertical consolidation and radial consolidation, both are linear on d-dd/dt plot (Tewatia 1998(Tewatia , 2010Tewatia et al 2007Tewatia et al , 2012Tewatia et al , 2013. Here, the lines OA and OB are the lines joining points O and A, and O and B.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 and 13, it can be shown that it leads to the following experimental Eq. 32 (Tewatia 2010;Tewatia et al 2012Tewatia et al , 2013 …”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory tests affirmed that parabolic excess pore pressure at the final stages of construction is more realistic than sinusoidal shape. Tewatia et al [13] derived a new equation for one-dimensional and three-dimensional consolidation as Eq. 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%