“…Both methods indicate that the mosaic distribution has long tails, more consistent with a Lorentzian than a Gaussian, although the ring method indicates a tail that is somewhat shorter than a Lorentzian for our most extensively analyzed dry sample. As recent papers that determine pole figures emphasize 11–13 , such determinations are greatly facilitated by the use of area detectors. Compared to the traditional rocking scan, an advantage of analyzing a Bragg ring is that fewer exposures are required and the angular range is not limited (due to a non-transparent substrate) to the [0,2θ B ] range of rocking scans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the bilayers in each domain are in-plane powders and there is only one-dimensional stacking order, the only characterizing parameter for the mosaicity is the angle α between the mean normal to the stack and the normal to the substrate; this is simpler than the more complex pole figure characterization of general thin films consisting of crystallites. 11–13 …”
Two methods of measuring the misorientation of domains in oriented multilamellar stacks of lipid bilayers superficially appeared to give different values for the mosaic spread. It is first shown that the traditional rocking method and a newer ring method give the same value of the mosaic spread when the two types of data are similarly analyzed. Both indicate a long-tailed, nearly Lorentzian, mosaic distribution function. Our primary innovation is the analysis of ring data as a function of the rocking angle. For our best oriented DOPC sample, this analysis is consistent with a single Lorentzian mosaic distribution function with width 0.05°. In contrast, samples of DMPC indicate a more complex mosaic distribution and larger widths.
“…Both methods indicate that the mosaic distribution has long tails, more consistent with a Lorentzian than a Gaussian, although the ring method indicates a tail that is somewhat shorter than a Lorentzian for our most extensively analyzed dry sample. As recent papers that determine pole figures emphasize 11–13 , such determinations are greatly facilitated by the use of area detectors. Compared to the traditional rocking scan, an advantage of analyzing a Bragg ring is that fewer exposures are required and the angular range is not limited (due to a non-transparent substrate) to the [0,2θ B ] range of rocking scans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the bilayers in each domain are in-plane powders and there is only one-dimensional stacking order, the only characterizing parameter for the mosaicity is the angle α between the mean normal to the stack and the normal to the substrate; this is simpler than the more complex pole figure characterization of general thin films consisting of crystallites. 11–13 …”
Two methods of measuring the misorientation of domains in oriented multilamellar stacks of lipid bilayers superficially appeared to give different values for the mosaic spread. It is first shown that the traditional rocking method and a newer ring method give the same value of the mosaic spread when the two types of data are similarly analyzed. Both indicate a long-tailed, nearly Lorentzian, mosaic distribution function. Our primary innovation is the analysis of ring data as a function of the rocking angle. For our best oriented DOPC sample, this analysis is consistent with a single Lorentzian mosaic distribution function with width 0.05°. In contrast, samples of DMPC indicate a more complex mosaic distribution and larger widths.
“…measurement from hours to minutes, allowing one to measure a pole figure every few minutes while heating the sample at a steady heating rate. 38 …”
Section: (D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In the following years, detailed texture studies of different silicide and germanide materials were carried out using this technique, revealing axiotaxy in a considerable number of silicide/germanide materials (see Table I). More recently, the use of a linear or area detector instead of a point detector 37,38 and the introduction of EBSD as a complementary technique 41 have enabled the ability to perform unambiguous phase identification of highly textured transient phases that form during the formation of NiSi 33,35 or NiGe 103 (see Section IV A). In the near future, area detectors will be routinely used to record texture information in situ, enabling the study of texture evolution during silicide/germanide formation.…”
“…In the article by Mocuta et al (2013Mocuta et al ( , x3, p. 1845, there is an error in the referencing of programs used to deal with the treatment of X-ray data acquired using area detectors. Rather than 'FIT2D (Boesecke, 2007; http://www.esrf.eu/computing/scientific/FIT2D)', the text should read 'SAXS (Boesecke, 2007), FIT2D (Hammersley et al, 1994(Hammersley et al, , 1996; http://www.esrf.eu/computing/scientific/FIT2D)'.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.