2017
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2017.1400548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast map matching, an algorithm integrating hidden Markov model with precomputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moving trajectory of a user on the road network can be recorded using GPS-enabled devices. Due to instrumental inaccuracies, the sampled trajectory points may not be well aligned with the locations in L. Following [33], we can preform the procedure of map matching for aligning trajectory points with locations in L. Definition 3. Trajectory.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moving trajectory of a user on the road network can be recorded using GPS-enabled devices. Due to instrumental inaccuracies, the sampled trajectory points may not be well aligned with the locations in L. Following [33], we can preform the procedure of map matching for aligning trajectory points with locations in L. Definition 3. Trajectory.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koller et al [25] propose fast map matching (FMM) based on HMM which replaces the Viterbi algorithm with a bidirectional Dijkstra and employs a lazy evaluation to reduce the number of costly route calculations. Yang et al [26] also present a fast map matching, an algorithm integrating hidden Markov model with precomputation. Qi et al [7] put forward a junction decision domain model, which is used to improve the map-matching algorithm based on the HMM.…”
Section: Global Matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the map-matching accuracy is evaluated by measuring the similarity between the mapmatching result and corresponding ground-truth. Currently, various evaluation metrics have been proposed for map-matching, including the correct road identification % [92,99,103,117,139,153], map-matching precision/recall [8], route mismatch fraction [47,90,115] and matching point/route accuracy [7,152]. There is still no consensus on which metrics can better evaluate the performance [72,74], and none of the existing work evaluates their differences.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple route-based metric, which is adopted in various papers [112,136], regards the matching route MR(T r) as a set of road edges ME (same applies to the ground-truth MR * (T r)) and evaluate the set precision/recall/Fmeasure (similar to the definition above). Alternatively, we can generate an overall score to indicate the accuracy [152], which is similar to the format of the Jaccard Similarity: In fact, most of the early works used the metric "Correct Road Identification%" to evaluate the percentage of roads in ground-truth that are correctly identified. It is also a route-based metric; however, this metric is never formally defined by any of them, which makes it inappropriate to simply compare their performance based on the claimed accuracies, not to mention the variety of datasets on which the experiments are conducted.…”
Section: Route-based Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%