2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast gas chromatography with solid phase extraction clean-up for ultratrace analysis of pesticide residues in baby food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of other solvents, such as ethyl acetate or acetone as extractants, has been tested (Lehotay et al 2010;Cunha et al 2007), but MeCN still remains as the priority solvent for the 4 QuEChERS procedure. The combination of MeCN as extractant combined with PTV injection has allowed reaching low limits of determination when combined with fast GC techniques (Hada et al 2000;Hercegová et al 2005;Korenková et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of other solvents, such as ethyl acetate or acetone as extractants, has been tested (Lehotay et al 2010;Cunha et al 2007), but MeCN still remains as the priority solvent for the 4 QuEChERS procedure. The combination of MeCN as extractant combined with PTV injection has allowed reaching low limits of determination when combined with fast GC techniques (Hada et al 2000;Hercegová et al 2005;Korenková et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesticides have been determined in baby food by the use of a wide range of techniques such as HPLC-MS/MS [7], GC-MS [8], GC-ECD [9], GC-MS-MS [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of fast GC/MS for the pesticide residues analysis in apples was developed and validated (HERCEGOVÁ et al 2005). The sample preparation based on acetonitrile extraction and SPE-NH 2 cleaning was modified, combined with the cell disruption, and optimisation of several parameters in the whole sample preparation procedure was performed.…”
Section: Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in the peak response with a number of injections were also eliminated by injections in sequences, where after 3 injections of the blank matrix sample (in order to occupy the active sites in the liner and to stabilise the conditions of an inlet) the alternation of spiked samples and real samples (resp. matrix matched samples) follows (HERCEGOVÁ et al 2005). For the determination of the concentration levels of pesticide residues in real samples, the subsequent sequence was used: 3-5× blank matrix standard, 2 parallel real sample extracts, 1× matrix matched standard, 2 parallel real sample extracts, 1× matrix matched standard, 2 parallel real sample extracts, 1× matrix matched standard.…”
Section: Reduction Of the Matrix Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%