2013
DOI: 10.17265/2159-5542/2013.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Cyclic Stimulus Flashing Modulates Dominance Duration in Binocular Rivalry

Abstract: This study addresses the problem whether duration of the dominant time (i.e., time interval during which the subject perceives only one of two presented stimuli under binocular rivalry) depends upon frequency of flashes of monocular stimuli. Two orthogonal black bars against white backgrounds were presented tachistoscopically for the left and right eyes, respectively. Duration of each bar flash was randomly changed by 1 ms from 4 till 20 ms (125−25 flash/s). We found that duration of the dominant time as funct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some years ago we addressed the problem of how the duration and frequency of flashing binocular competitive images affect the unstable perception in case of binocular rivalry. It was shown that while the flash frequency was changing, the rate of perceptual alteration varied periodically (Geissler et al, 2012;Vaitkevicius et al 2013). In order to examine whether the PCA results obtained in case of the perception of ambiguous figures and binocular rivalry are similar, we compared these results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some years ago we addressed the problem of how the duration and frequency of flashing binocular competitive images affect the unstable perception in case of binocular rivalry. It was shown that while the flash frequency was changing, the rate of perceptual alteration varied periodically (Geissler et al, 2012;Vaitkevicius et al 2013). In order to examine whether the PCA results obtained in case of the perception of ambiguous figures and binocular rivalry are similar, we compared these results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) The continuous solid and dashed point-like curves are the factor loadings (F3) calculated for the Necker cube and binocular rivalry data of two different groups of observers respectively (Geissler et al, 2012;Vaitkevicius et al 2013). (b, c) The solid line indicates factor loadings for Necker cube (Nc) and binocular rivalry (BR) respectively.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) The continuous solid and dashed point-like curves are the factor loadings (F3) calculated for the Necker cube and binocular rivalry data of two different groups of observers respectively (Geissler et al, 2012;Vaitkevicius et al 2013) ANOVA results for the factor of flash duration for separate subjects. The parameters of y(k) functions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%