2013
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2012.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Cost-Volume Filtering for Visual Correspondence and Beyond

Abstract: Many computer vision tasks can be formulated as labeling problems. The desired solution is often a spatially smooth labeling where label transitions are aligned with color edges of the input image. We show that such solutions can be efficiently achieved by smoothing the label costs with a very fast edge-preserving filter. In this paper, we propose a generic and simple framework comprising three steps: 1) constructing a cost volume, 2) fast cost volume filtering, and 3) Winner-Takes-All label selection. Our mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
423
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 582 publications
(425 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
423
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binocular stereo matching is intrinsically constrained with geometric projection due to the usage of rectified images which simplifies the matching task to a two frame correspondence and inspires a large number of algorithms [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Generally, binocular stereo matching consists of four steps [1]: cost calculation, cost aggregation, disparity optimization, and refinement.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Binocular stereo matching is intrinsically constrained with geometric projection due to the usage of rectified images which simplifies the matching task to a two frame correspondence and inspires a large number of algorithms [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Generally, binocular stereo matching consists of four steps [1]: cost calculation, cost aggregation, disparity optimization, and refinement.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the researches focus on the cost aggregation and disparity optimization in recent years. According to the disparity optimization, local or non-local methods [2][3][4][5]8,9], which employ the cost aggregation followed by the "Winner Takes All" principle, and global methods [6,10], which tend to use the pixel-wise or object-wise cost function optimized by minimization of an energy function in the Markov Random Field (MRF) have been developed. However, most of state-of-the-art methods suffer common difficulties in certain…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for cost-volume filtering, given the raw cost volume ( ) computed for a certain disparity at pixel , then the filtered cost value can be computed as ̃( ) = ∑ ( ) . Here, different edge-aware filtering technologies [14,11,8] can be applied and the difference between them lies primarily in defining . Yoon [20] performs an adaptive support window technique for cost filtering, which solves boundary issues successfully, but it costs O(|W|) computation.…”
Section: Cost Computation and Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to preserve depth discontinuities, edge-aware weighted filters, e.g. geodesic distance, bilateral and guided filtering, can be used at the cost of noticeably higher computational complexity (Yoon and Kweon, 2006;Hosni et al, 2009;Hosni et al, 2013). The main drawback of local techniques is that they require evaluating the full disparity space image (DSI).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%