Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, 2002. IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2002.1188019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and reliable obstacle detection and segmentation for cross-country navigation

Abstract: Obstacle detection (OD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
8

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
68
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Enlarging the projected size only makes sense if the point cloud is virtually aligned with the ground and the projection accounts for it (option 4), which apparently was not the case in refs. [7] and [12]. However, we acknowledge it is a natural assumption since we made it ourselves in ref.…”
Section: H T < |Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enlarging the projected size only makes sense if the point cloud is virtually aligned with the ground and the projection accounts for it (option 4), which apparently was not the case in refs. [7] and [12]. However, we acknowledge it is a natural assumption since we made it ourselves in ref.…”
Section: H T < |Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most systems have focused on navigating a robot on a semi-structured road surface. Algorithms designed for unstructured terrain emphasize detection of geometric obstacles such as rocks or steep slopes [4], [5]. These papers have not addressed the issue of the soil itself being a hazard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most approaches use vision or ladar sensors. In ladar-based methods, the focus is not on estimating the type of the ground surface and detecting non-geometric hazards, but on segmenting the ground surface from vegetation and from obstacles like rocks or trunks [2]- [5]. Vision-based approaches usually use visual features like color or texture for terrain classification [5]- [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%