2009
DOI: 10.4310/cms.2009.v7.n3.a12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast algorithm for extracting the diagonal of the inverse matrix with application to the electronic structure analysis of metallic systems

Abstract: Abstract. We propose an algorithm for extracting the diagonal of the inverse matrices arising from electronic structure calculation. The proposed algorithm uses a hierarchical decomposition of the computational domain. It first constructs hierarchical Schur complements of the interior points for the blocks of the domain in a bottom-up pass and then extracts the diagonal entries efficiently in a top-down pass by exploiting the hierarchical local dependence of the inverse matrices. The overall cost of our algori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results presented above, it is clear that the CS2CF strategy is well suited for bringing down the computational wall times of large-scale Kohn−Sham calculations. We have already demonstrated 29 the superior computational efficiency of the standard CheFSI strategy within DGDFT compared to existing alternatives based on direct diagonalization (using ScaLA-PACK) and certain sparse-direct solution strategies (namely, PEXSI 14,15,21 ). Since the CS2CF strategy is successful in bringing down the wall times of the standard CheFSI approach, it is the method of choice for large-scale calculations in DGDFT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results presented above, it is clear that the CS2CF strategy is well suited for bringing down the computational wall times of large-scale Kohn−Sham calculations. We have already demonstrated 29 the superior computational efficiency of the standard CheFSI strategy within DGDFT compared to existing alternatives based on direct diagonalization (using ScaLA-PACK) and certain sparse-direct solution strategies (namely, PEXSI 14,15,21 ). Since the CS2CF strategy is successful in bringing down the wall times of the standard CheFSI approach, it is the method of choice for large-scale calculations in DGDFT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the large number of atoms contained in POTi 12 Cr 6 systems, the standard diagonalization (DIAGON) method in SIESTA based on the ScaLAPACK software package becomes prohibitively expensive . Therefore, we use the recently developed PEXSI (Pole Expansion and Selected Inversion) technique to reduce the computational time without sacrificing accuracy even for metallic systems. The PEXSI technique allows the evaluation of physical quantities such as electron density, total energy, and atomic forces to be performed without calculating any eigenvalue or eigenfunction. Furthermore, the SIESTA-PEXSI method can passively scale to more than 10,000 processors on high-performance computing machines. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], a low-complexity minimum mean square error-frequency domain equalization (MMSE-FDE) method was proposed for CP-OFDM. In this method, the full elements of channel frequency response (CFR) matrix which is converted from the time domain channel impulse response (CIR) is approximated by a banded matrix so as to employ a fast algorithm for inverse matrix calculation [5]. However, the CIR matrix is constructed by using only data period which leads the degradation of bit error rate (BER) performance in deep fading channels.…”
Section: Problems Of Conventional Fde Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of complexity required in the fast algorithm for calculation of inverse matrix G becomes O½3ðQ 1 þ 1Þ 2 P which is relatively lower than the direct inverse matrix calculation [5]. In the demodulation of data information, the estimatedX T in (8) is converted to the time domain signalx T by P-points IDFT.…”
Section: Low Complexity Enhanced Mmse-fde Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation