2010
DOI: 10.1659/mrd-journal-d-10-00018.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fascinating Remoteness: The Dilemma of Hiking Tourism Development in Peripheral Mountain Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumption patterns also tend to be concentrated in the two most developed areas of Maggiore and Lugano, resulting in fewer than half of the activities located in Bellinzona and Mendrisiotto being visited. It is important to note that the north part of Bellinzona region is more remote and mountainous, appealing mostly to hikers looking for a more strenuous activity (Boller, Hunziker, Conedera, Elsasser, & Krebs, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumption patterns also tend to be concentrated in the two most developed areas of Maggiore and Lugano, resulting in fewer than half of the activities located in Bellinzona and Mendrisiotto being visited. It is important to note that the north part of Bellinzona region is more remote and mountainous, appealing mostly to hikers looking for a more strenuous activity (Boller, Hunziker, Conedera, Elsasser, & Krebs, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applying the ROS, the landscapes can, e.g., be zoned in primitive, semi-primitive non-motorized, semi-primitive motorized, rustic, concentrated, and modern urbanized classes [26]. Two elements are particularly important in determining ROS classes: remoteness (e.g., large undisturbed areas far away from infrastructure in the primitive end of the spectrum) and degree of naturalness (evidence of human activity) [23]. A third element is social experience, and the possibilities to experience solitude, authentic nature, challenge, and self-reliance, often associated by a wilderness experience [24,33].…”
Section: Recreation Along the Infrastructure Continuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roads, marked trails, campsites and bridges will attract and concentrate visitors in particular areas. Such infrastructure can, however, negatively impact those who are seeking more undisturbed experiences due to factors like solitude, remoteness and isolation in wilderness areas [23,24]. One way to overcome the diverging and even conflicting needs and preferences for infrastructure among forest visitors is to differentiate the recreational area planning and management [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most frequently researched aspects are those related with the role played by hiking in the sustainable development and dynamization of rural territories [18], the environmental impact of the use of hiking paths on for example the terrain, the vegetation or the fauna [38,39], the conflicts that may arise between hiking and other activities as a consequence of the use of paths which are typically multifunctional [40,41], the behavior of hikers or the reasons why tourists choose hiking as a vacation activity [42][43][44][45]. Other interesting themes include the management of hiking paths [46][47][48][49] and theoretical and conceptual reflections regarding the different types of paths [50,51]. There are relatively few studies on the gradual development of hiking as a leisure and recreational activity that can promote development in the territory [1,2,11] and almost none at all that analyze the factors behind this process.…”
Section: Objectives and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%