Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland

Abstract

Soil degradation is globally concerning due to its adverse effects on the environment and agricultural production. Much of Swaziland is at risk from degradation. This paper assesses farmer perceptions and responses to soil degradation in 2002 and 2014, focusing on two land uses that underpin rural livelihoods: arable land and rangeland areas. It uses repeat household surveys and semi‐structured interviews, in two case study chiefdoms in the country's middleveld (KaBhudla and Engcayini) in the first longitudinal study of its kind. We find that observations of land degradation are perceived mainly through changes in land productivity, with chemical degradation occurring predominantly on arable land and physical degradation and erosion mainly in rangeland areas. Changes in rainfall are particularly important in determining responses. While perceptions of the causes and impacts of degradation largely concur with the scientific literature, responses were constrained by poor land availability, shorter and more unpredictable cropping seasons because of changing rains and low awareness, access to or knowledge of agricultural inputs. We suggest that sustainable arable land management can be enhanced through improved access to alternative sources of water, use of management practices that retain soil and moisture and greater access to agricultural inputs and capacity building to ensure their appropriate use. We suggest collaborative management for settlement planning that integrates soil conservation and livestock management strategies such as controlled stocking levels and rotational grazing could improve land quality in rangeland areas. Together, these approaches can help land users to better manage change. © 2016 The Authors. Land Degradation & Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

A Double Hurdle Estimation of Sales Decisions by Smallholder Beef Cattle Farmers in Eswatini

“…Such losses are aggravated by the low levels of market participation, thus defeating the principle of sustainable business management. The direct implication of such an economically unsustainable practice undermines the regenerative capacity of the subsector, especially after droughts, [46]. Therefore, research on smallholder market participation is paramount for sustainable rural and national economic growth [47].…”

Caring for soil life in the Anthropocene: The role of attentiveness in more‐than‐human ethics

“…In contrast, in human geography soils have principally been conceptualised as a resource, a “natural thing” belonging to the world of physical science (Bridge, , p. 1219). As a result, scholarship on soils in human geography has predominantly worked from a perspectivist standpoint, noting and investigating the consequences of the socially contingent meanings of “soils” and their processes, notably soil degradation (Cudlínová et al., ; Orchard et al., ; Reed & Stringer, ). These inquiries interrogate the role that various knowledges play in soil conservation and management, but leave unexamined the dynamic, socially contingent constitution of soil matter (e.g., Dea & Scoones, ; de Bruyn & Abbey, ; Ingram, ; Klingen et al., ; Schneider et al., ).…”

Willingness to Pay for Critical Land

“…Land degradation is an insidious, gradual process of farmers may not easily perceive its severity. The smallholder farmers' decision-making procedures are strongly based on their perceptions of the forces that drive degradation [8] and its consequences on their lives and livelihoods. Perception will partly control awareness, goals and practical actions.…”