Farmer Awareness and Cost Estimation

Pathak, Sujata; Shah, Drishti; N, Shah; Shah, Viraj; Ughade, Saurabh

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3367666

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The score values for the regions with moderate economic conditions and farmers′ information technology awareness are in the range of 0.724-0.731, while those of the regions with acceptable economic conditions and farmers′ information technology awareness range from 0.740 to 0.751. Therefore, the choice of the two methods largely depends on the regional economic conditions and farmers′ awareness of information technology [36][37][38][39].…”

Section: Comprehensive Results In All Farmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The score values for the regions with moderate economic conditions and farmers' information technology awareness are in the range of 0.724-0.731, while those of the regions with acceptable economic conditions and farmers' information technology awareness range from 0.740 to 0.751. Therefore, the choice of the two methods largely depends on the regional economic conditions and farmers' awareness of information technology [36][37][38][39]. Figure 6 shows that the score of the two methods in unfortunate economic conditions is the lowest (0.702) for the farmers with a poor awareness of information technology (Heze Yuncheng), whereas the highest score (0.755) is achieved by the Weifang Anqiu region.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Moisture Sensing Technology Applications Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Delphi

Tao

Ren

et al. 2021

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The demand for smart irrigation and water-saving practices in agriculture has triggered the development of different soil moisture sensing techniques that can operate under harsh field conditions. In this study, a soil moisture sensing technology appropriate for the field applications was comprehensively evaluated. From a qualitative and quantitative perspective, the Delphi and analytic hierarchy process methods were used to construct an index system involving technological advantage, economic benefit, risk analysis, policy support, four second-level indicators, and 23 fourth-level indicators. The results showed that economic benefits account for the largest weight. The practical evaluation resulted in 12 farms that showed that the selected soil water sensing methods performed reasonably and exhibited obvious water-saving irrigation benefits, which are usually used for scheduling irrigation. The overall score of M4 in different soil types was 0.2% lower than that of M5. Farms with reasonable economic conditions and a high awareness scored 5.3% higher on technology than those with modest economic conditions, which clearly affects the evaluation scores of the two technologies. The evaluation results help farmers and government decision-making bodies in technology selection, production decision-making, and risk control.

show abstract

Section: Comprehensive Results In All Farmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%