2013
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm-scale costs and returns for second generation bioenergy cropping systems in the US Corn Belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of cropping systems impacts biomass production rates , and tradeoffs are likely between the financial incentives (Manatt et al, 2013) and the impacts to ecosystem functioning derived from carbon cycling processes (AndersonTeixera et al, 2013). Our data show that short-term benefits to belowground C cycling-specifically the physical protection of SOM-are apparent within three years following establishment of no-till bioenergy cropping systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of cropping systems impacts biomass production rates , and tradeoffs are likely between the financial incentives (Manatt et al, 2013) and the impacts to ecosystem functioning derived from carbon cycling processes (AndersonTeixera et al, 2013). Our data show that short-term benefits to belowground C cycling-specifically the physical protection of SOM-are apparent within three years following establishment of no-till bioenergy cropping systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second generation technologies are known to have higher costs as alluded to by a number of studies (Meihui et al, 2015;Ramamurthi et al, 2014;Pourhashem et al, 2013;Manatt et al, 2013;Haarlemmer et al, 2012;Stephen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resource Requirement In Bioenergy Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have demonstrated that incorporating perennial vegetation can disproportionately enhance ecosystem services from extensively managed croplands, including erosion control, improvements in water quality, and pest control (Helmers et al 2012, Gopalakrishnan et al 2012, Meehan et al 2013, Asbjornsen et al 2014, Daigh et al 2014, but usually at an economic penalty under current market and policy conditions (Manatt et al 2013, Guerry et al 2015. Top-down land management schemes are widespread (Osmond et al 2012) but have had limited implementation success in the Maize Belt because they do not align with many social and economic constraints, notably land tenure (Morton and Brown 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%