Farklı Sıra Arası ve Sıra Üzeri Mesafelerinin Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)’nın Besin İçeriğine Etkisi

Temel, Işıl; Keski̇n, Bilal

doi:10.24180/ijaws.486327

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In previous studies, NDF was determined as 42.3-45.2% for 6 quinoa varieties (Kaya and Aydemir, 2020), as 38.0-43.5% in quinoa (Temel and Keskin, 2019). Although the present study findings were similar to previous reports, it could be observed that the NDF content varied within a wide range.…”

Section: Acid Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%) and Neutral Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%)supporting

confidence: 88%

“…It was determined ADF ratio varied between 22.8 and 26.9% (Temel and Keskin, 2019), between 17.9 and 30.5% (Kaya and Aydemir, 2020) in quinoa varieties, between 22.9 and 43.2% in certain gramineae forage plants (Sayar et al, 2018). It could be observed that previous study findings on quinoa were lower when compared to our findings.…”

Section: Acid Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%) and Neutral Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%)contrasting

confidence: 62%

“…The previous studies conducted on various quinoa varieties reported crude protein content between 13.5 and 17.7 % during the flowering period (Temel and Keskin, 2019), between 16.3 and 17.8 % in physiologically mature plants (Tan and Temel, 2017), between 11.3 and 13.6 % (Kaya and Aydemir, 2020). Although the present study findings were mainly consistent with other studies conducted with quinoa, specific differences were observed due to the effect of the harvest period.…”

Section: Crude Protein Content (%) and Dry Matter Content (%)mentioning

confidence: 96%

“…In some works of literature, DDM content varied between 65.1 and 67.2 % in various quinoa species (Kaya and Aydemir, 2020) and 68.0 and 71.1 % (Temel and Keskin, 2019) based on row and inter-row spacing applications.…”

Section: Acidic Detergent Insoluble Protein (%) and Digestible Dry Matter (%)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The studies conducted on quinoa reported that DMI varied between 2.8 and 3.2 % (Temel and Keskin, 2019) and between 2.7 and 2.8 % (Kaya and Aydemir, 2020). It was suggested that the compatibility of these figures with the present study was because all were conducted with the same plant species and the differences were due to harvesting in the flowering period.…”

Section: Dry Matter Intake (%) and Relative Feed Values (%)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Feed-value of post-harvest quinoa plant sections grown by different cultural applications

Zulkadir¹,

İdikut²

2021

International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study, the grains of the quinoa plant grown in the Kahramanmaraş region, Turkey, which was sown at different times (March 26, April 2, 13 and 26, and May 11) in various row spacing applications (20, 40 and 60 cm) was separated, and the feed-worthiness of the remaining plant sections were analyzed. The study findings demonstrated that crude protein content was 9.70-19.30%, dry matter ratio was 86.18-88.20%, acid detergent fiber content was 42.95-55.95%, neutral detergent fiber content was 51.23-64.27%, acid detergent insoluble protein content was 0.88-1.37%, digestible dry matter content was 45.3-55.4%, dry matter intake rate was 1.87-2.34%, relative feed value was 66.88-96.49%, and quality standard value varied between III and V. Mineral content was determined as follows:

show abstract

Section: Acid Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%) and Neutral Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%)supporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Acid Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%) and Neutral Detergent Insoluble Fiber (%)contrasting

confidence: 62%

Section: Crude Protein Content (%) and Dry Matter Content (%)mentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Acidic Detergent Insoluble Protein (%) and Digestible Dry Matter (%)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Dry Matter Intake (%) and Relative Feed Values (%)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Feed-value of post-harvest quinoa plant sections grown by different cultural applications

Zulkadir¹,

İdikut²

2021

International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Determination of forage yield performance of different Chenopodium quinoa cultivars in saline conditions

Keski̇n

Temel

Tohumcu

2023

Zemdirbyste-Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CHANGE IN FORAGE QUALITY OF WHOLE PLANT, LEAF AND STEM ACCORDING TO SOWING AND HARVESTING PERIODS IN Atriplex nitens SCHKUHR GROWN WITHOUT FERTILIZER

Temel

Keski̇n

GÜNER

2022

Turkish Journal of Field Crops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Atriplex nitens, which can grow in extreme ecological conditions and produce a high amount of forage material, has been seen as an important alternative forage source for livestock. With the present study, the effect of different sowing (mid-April, late-April, early-May, mid-May) and harvesting periods (end of vegetative period, beginning of flowering, full flowering period) on forage quality was tried to be determined. For this purpose, a study was planned according to randomized complete block design in split plots with three replications in Iğdır irrigated conditions in 2019 and 2020. As a result of the study, the forage quality values of the stem, leaf and whole plant differed according to the sowing and harvesting periods. Accordingly, it was determined that the crude protein, dry matter digestible, disgestible energy, metabolic energy and relative feed value of the stem, leaf and whole plant increased as the sowing time was delayed, but neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre ratios decreased. Similar results were obtained by moving harvests to an earlier time. As a result, it was determined that the stem, leaf and whole plant produced a low, very high and medium quality forage material in late sowing and early harvests, respectively.

show abstract

Farklı Sıra Arası ve Sıra Üzeri Mesafelerinin Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)’nın Besin İçeriğine Etkisi

Abstract: ORCID ID (Yazar sırasına göre/By author order) 0000-0001-5968-3609 0000-0001-6826-9768 ** Bu çalışma birinci yazarın yüksek lisans tezinin bir bölümüdür.

Cited by 16 publications

References 17 publications

Feed-value of post-harvest quinoa plant sections grown by different cultural applications

Feed-value of post-harvest quinoa plant sections grown by different cultural applications

Determination of forage yield performance of different Chenopodium quinoa cultivars in saline conditions

CHANGE IN FORAGE QUALITY OF WHOLE PLANT, LEAF AND STEM ACCORDING TO SOWING AND HARVESTING PERIODS IN Atriplex nitens SCHKUHR GROWN WITHOUT FERTILIZER

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About