2020 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition (DATE) 2020
DOI: 10.23919/date48585.2020.9116247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FANNet: Formal Analysis of Noise Tolerance, Training Bias and Input Sensitivity in Neural Networks

Abstract: With a constant improvement in the network architectures and training methodologies, Neural Networks (NNs) are increasingly being deployed in real-world Machine Learning systems. However, despite their impressive performance on "known inputs", these NNs can fail absurdly on the "unseen inputs", especially if these real-time inputs deviate from the training dataset distributions, or contain certain types of input noise. This indicates the low noise tolerance of NNs, which is a major reason for the recent increa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They presented theoretical results with respect to the approximations of ReLU NNs and implemented a solver to verify ReLU NNs. Naseer et al [20] proposed a methodology that leverages model checking to perform formal NN analyses under diferent input noise ranges to rigorously analyze the noise tolerance of NNs. Yin et al [21] utilized a probabilistic model-checking tool PRISM to verify the reliability of an artiicial neural network (ANN)-based system in medical diagnosis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They presented theoretical results with respect to the approximations of ReLU NNs and implemented a solver to verify ReLU NNs. Naseer et al [20] proposed a methodology that leverages model checking to perform formal NN analyses under diferent input noise ranges to rigorously analyze the noise tolerance of NNs. Yin et al [21] utilized a probabilistic model-checking tool PRISM to verify the reliability of an artiicial neural network (ANN)-based system in medical diagnosis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section describes the notions and provides the relevant formalism for balanced datasets, robustness, robustness bias, bias estimation and noise tolerance (Nanda et al, 2021;Naseer et al, 2020), which form the basis of Unbiased-Nets. The terminology and notations introduced in the section will be used throughout the rest of the paper.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These misclassifying noise patterns (i.e., the counterexamples) act as inputs for the counterexample analysis. These noise patterns can be collected either using a formal framework (such as the ones based on model checking used by Naseer et al (2020) and Bhatti, Naseer, Shafique, and Hasan (2022)) or an empirical approach (like the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) attack (Goodfellow, Shlens, & Szegedy, 2015)).…”
Section: Bias Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach gives promising results but suffers from its complexity, and the verification is exponential in the number of features. [159] propose FANNET, a formal analysis framework that uses model checking to evaluate the noise tolerance of a trained neural network. During the verification process, in case of non-satisfiability of the input property, a counterexample is generated.…”
Section: Smt-based Model Checking: Direct Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%