2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.12045
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Certify Machine Learning Based Safety-critical Systems? A Systematic Literature Review

Florian Tambon,
Gabriel Laberge,
Le An
et al.

Abstract: Context: Machine Learning (ML) has been at the heart of many innovations over the past years. However, including it in so-called "safety-critical" systems such as automotive or aeronautic has proven to be very challenging, since the shift in paradigm that ML brings completely changes traditional certification approaches.Objective: This paper aims to elucidate challenges related to the certification of ML-based safety-critical systems, as well as the solutions that are proposed in the literature to tackle them,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
(269 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a crucial but not well addressed topic is the relation between approximate computing and the standardization of ML-based systems in safety critical applications. Safety standards for systems ML-based are yet to be formalized [117] and as a result, the impact of approximate computing on the system's certification remains unclear. The examined hardware approximation techniques are deterministic and are not expected to impact the certification process.…”
Section: Conclusion Challenges and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a crucial but not well addressed topic is the relation between approximate computing and the standardization of ML-based systems in safety critical applications. Safety standards for systems ML-based are yet to be formalized [117] and as a result, the impact of approximate computing on the system's certification remains unclear. The examined hardware approximation techniques are deterministic and are not expected to impact the certification process.…”
Section: Conclusion Challenges and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous review works have focused on specific techniques-for example, learning-based model predictive control (MPC) (9), iterative learning control (10,11), model-based RL (12), dataefficient policy search (13), imitation learning (14), or the use of RL in robotics (15,16) and in optimal control (17)-without emphasizing the safety aspect. Recent surveys on safe learning control have focused on either control-theoretic (18) or RL (19) approaches and do not provide a unifying perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous review works focused on specific techniques-for example, learning-based model predictive control (MPC) (7), iterative learning control (ILC) (8,9), model-based RL (10), data-efficient policy search (11), imitation learning (12), or the use of RL in robotics (13,14) and in optimal control (15)-without emphasizing the safety aspect. Recent surveys on safe learning control focus on either control-theoretic (16) or RL approaches (17), and do not provide a unifying perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%