The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity Among Family Firms 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Values: Influencers in the Development of Financial and Non-financial Dynamics in Family Firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In three cases, the employee share ownership has been introduced by the senior family members as part of the main social innovations and seen as a philosophical pillar of their company (case one, two and five). In line with Seaman et al (2018) arguing that the concentration of values in family business influences perceptibly the strategic orientations of the firm, a clear orientation of the digital strategy in which human considerations are high has been observed here. Interestingly, these family firms, by emphasising their solidarity and concerns towards their employees, develop collective intelligence and subsidiarity principles within their organisations as expressly mentioned by three interviewees (Y2, Y3, S5) and defined by Melé (2005) as an ethical principle in which managers should not handle activities which could be efficiently carried out by the employees.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In three cases, the employee share ownership has been introduced by the senior family members as part of the main social innovations and seen as a philosophical pillar of their company (case one, two and five). In line with Seaman et al (2018) arguing that the concentration of values in family business influences perceptibly the strategic orientations of the firm, a clear orientation of the digital strategy in which human considerations are high has been observed here. Interestingly, these family firms, by emphasising their solidarity and concerns towards their employees, develop collective intelligence and subsidiarity principles within their organisations as expressly mentioned by three interviewees (Y2, Y3, S5) and defined by Melé (2005) as an ethical principle in which managers should not handle activities which could be efficiently carried out by the employees.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…One of the first to question this assumption was Ward (1987), who used a three-stage model to identify distinct types of family firms, suggesting that differences exist among family firms and their goals. In recent years, the number of studies investigating family firm heterogeneity has grown, 1 leading to insights that family firms differ from one another in their noneconomic goals and socioemotional wealth (SEW; e.g., Chua et al, 2015;Gómez-Mejía et al, 2007;Williams et al, 2019), values (e.g., García-Álvarez & López-Sintas, 2001;Seaman et al, 2019), governance configurations (e.g., Hoopes & Miller, 2006;Schmid et al, 2015), family and generational involvement (e.g., Bammens et al, 2008;Kellermanns et al, 2008;Nordqvist et al, 2014), and interpersonal exchange (e.g., Long & Mathews, 2011), to name a few examples. Although studies in the broader management literature note differences among nonfamily firms, the family's involvement in the firm creates unique complexities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly, family businesses are different from non-family ones (Moussa & Elgiziry, 2019) since family ties reflect a socio-economic background, culture, and value system, which impact the decision-making process (Seaman, Bent & Silva, 2019). By reference to the nature of purposes, it can be argued that family businesses tend to be challenging because, in addition to managing common business needs and opportunities, they must take into account the needs and desires of the owning family.…”
Section: The Family Business: a Controversial Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the particular case of family businesses, the incorporation of behavioral variables is much more legitimate. This may be justified by the presence of family ties reflecting a socio-economic background, culture, and value system that may influence the decision-making process (Seaman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Financial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%