1991
DOI: 10.2307/2131578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Traditions, Political Periods, and the Development of Partisan Orientations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
108
1
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
108
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has shown IG influences at work in many spheres, such as achievement orientation, religious values, political affiliation, and gender and racial attitudes (e.g., Beck and Jennings 1991;Whitbeck and Gecas 1988). Of special interest is evidence indicating that 'explanatory style' (optimistic or pessimistic) is transferred intergenerationally from mothers to their children (Seligman 2006).…”
Section: Intergenerational Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown IG influences at work in many spheres, such as achievement orientation, religious values, political affiliation, and gender and racial attitudes (e.g., Beck and Jennings 1991;Whitbeck and Gecas 1988). Of special interest is evidence indicating that 'explanatory style' (optimistic or pessimistic) is transferred intergenerationally from mothers to their children (Seligman 2006).…”
Section: Intergenerational Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has mostly focused on mainstream parties in relatively stable political environments and has been criticized for not being able to explain processes of change (Greenstein, 1970;Sapiro, 2004;Wass, 2007). The critique is directed towards the research that sees children as being more or less direct recipients or inheritors of parental political traits (Beck and Jennings, 1991). In addition to the fact that children may observe and copy their parents' norms and behaviour, they may also be influenced by age-peers, age-graded institutions such as the school and socio-historical events (Bengtson, 1975).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals in international organizations usually come from diverse national backgrounds+ When do national backgrounds reinforce, and when do they weaken, international socialization? 14+ See Checkel, this volume;Conover 1991;andHooghe 2002+ 15+ See Beck andJennings 1991;Johnston 2001;Risse 2000;and Sears and Valentino 1997+ 16+ Deception and attitude softness can be problematic among ordinary citizens, as public opinion research has demonstrated+ Zaller 1992+ Attitude softness, however, is rarely an issue for elites whose views tend to be more crystallized on political objects+ Jennings 1992+ There is no fire-proof method for distinguishing true from deceptive preferences+ I cannot discount the possibility that some respondents concealed their true preferences, though the circumstances of the interview~anonymity, voluntary participation, nonsensitive character of the questions!, and the senior status of the respondents considerable discretion, weak peer control! are reassuring+ 17+ In international relations, rationalists tend to take preferences as exogenous, while constructivists endogenize them+ However, as Fearon and Wendt remind us, it is unwise to exaggerate the difference+ Whether one endogenizes preferences is an analytical choice dictated by one's research question+ See Fearon and Wendt 2003, 64+ Preferences are the first step, and behavior the second step, in the two-step dance that is international cooperation+ Legro 1996+ 18+ Checkel, this volume+ • Inculcating values is a gradual process: the longer one's involvement in an organization, the more one's beliefs can be expected to approximate that organization's norms+ 19 While socialization usually requires long-term exposure, some individuals need less time than others+ Thus the rate at which individuals internalize individual norms varies+ Effect of novelty.…”
Section: Shaping Preferences In International Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%