Handbook of Family Policies Across the Globe 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6771-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Policies in Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth in female education and economic activity and rapid cultural change in family norms have been taking place alongside a postponement and decline in marriage ( Lesthaeghe, 2014 ). High GDP per capita and extensive social support systems (including lower taxes for those who are single) makes marriage in Norway less of an economic necessity ( Baran, Diehnelt, & Jones, 2014 ). High levels of contraceptive use (the contraceptive pill was legalized 1967 in Norway) have contributed to lower social pressures for marriage, fewer marriages resulting from unplanned pregnancies, and higher proportions of people who choose not to marry ( Rijken & Liefbroer, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth in female education and economic activity and rapid cultural change in family norms have been taking place alongside a postponement and decline in marriage ( Lesthaeghe, 2014 ). High GDP per capita and extensive social support systems (including lower taxes for those who are single) makes marriage in Norway less of an economic necessity ( Baran, Diehnelt, & Jones, 2014 ). High levels of contraceptive use (the contraceptive pill was legalized 1967 in Norway) have contributed to lower social pressures for marriage, fewer marriages resulting from unplanned pregnancies, and higher proportions of people who choose not to marry ( Rijken & Liefbroer, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to keep in mind that health effects of family transitions may vary between countries. In particular, the rather generous social welfare policies in Norway (Baran et al 2014) may make breakups less burdening than elsewhere. It is also possible that the effects of dissolved marriages would be more different from the effects of dissolved consensual unions in settings where these living arrangements are more different than they are in Nordic countries.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that Norwegian children are influenced by the age at which they experience parental divorce (or disruption of their parents' consensual union), there is no obvious reason why such effects should not also exist in other settings. In fact, we might expect even stronger effects elsewhere, as the rather generous social welfare policies in Norway (Baran et al 2014) may serve to dampen some of the potentially adverse implications of parental disruption.…”
Section: The Norwegian Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%