Family interventions and their effect on adolescent alcohol use in general populations; a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Smit, Evelien; Verdurmen, Jacqueline; Monshouwer, Karin; Smit, Filip

doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.032

Cited by 129 publications

(94 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The second is a new study that offers a comparative test of the attitude accessibility and dissonance accounts of the QBE. We reanalysed Wood et al's data using a backwards elimination procedure for multivariate regression analysis (see Smit, Verdurmen, Monshouwer, & Smit, 2008;Steffgen, Recchia, & Viechtbauer, 2013) to see if the forced entry procedure that was originally deployed may have missed the possible role of rated dissonance. Findings revealed four significant moderators that explained approximately one-fifth of the between-study variance in effect sizes for QBE studies (adjusted R 2 = 19.22%).…”

Section: New Evidence In Relation To the Cognitive Dissonance Explanamentioning

confidence: 99%

The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis

Wilding

Conner

Sandberg

et al. 2016

European Review of Social Psychology

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: New Evidence In Relation To the Cognitive Dissonance Explanamentioning

confidence: 99%

The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis

Wilding

Conner

Sandberg

et al. 2016

European Review of Social Psychology

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It has been found that the most effective prevention measures are those that are targeted to schoolchildren and to their parents at the same time (Smit et al, 2008;Wu et al, 2003). However, it has to be taken into account that every country needs it's own implementation of a specific program due to cultural differences (Koning et al, 2010).…”

Section: Trends In Alcohol Consumption and Drunkennessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol Consumption Among Adolescents in Estonia 1994 - 2010

Pärna¹,

Tael²,

Ringmets³

et al. 2012

Public Health - Social and Behavioral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Systematic reviews of evidence-based interventions (e.g., Farrington & Welsh, 1999;Lochman, & Steenhoven, 2002;Kumpfer & Alvarado, 2003;Velleman, Templeton, & Copello, 2005;Austin, Macgowan & Wagner, 2005;Stefan & Miclea, 2010;Foxcroft & Tsertsvadze, 2011;Kaslow, Broth, Smith & Collins, 2012) and meta-analytic reviews (e.g. Smit et al, 2008;Kaminski, Valle, Filene & Boyle, 2008) indicated that these interventions have demonstrated efficacy in preventing substance use and other child problem behaviors. These positive results have been reported in different settings (Aalborg et al, 2010;Letarte, Normandeau & Allard, 2010;Redmond et al, 2009;Henggeler & Schoenwald, 2011;Brook, McDonald & Yan, 2012;Donavan, Wood, Frayjo, Black & Surette, 2012), target groups (Mindel & Hoefer, 2006;Orte, Touza, Ballester & March, 2008;McDaniel, Braiden, Onyekwelu, Murphy & Regan, 2011;Posthumus, Raaimakers, Maassen, Engeland, & Matthys, 2012;Kumpfer, Whiteside, Greene & Allen, 2010), cultures (Skärstrand, Larsson & Andréasson, 2008;Pérez, et al, 2009;Kumpfer, Xie & O'Driscoll, 2012;Brotman et al, 2009;Ortega, Giannotta, Latina & Ciairano, 2012) and addicted behaviours (Trudeau, Spoth, Randall & Azevedo, 2007;Zhong, et al, 2011;Donovan et al, 2012).…”

Section: Objeto Y Alcance De La Presente Revisión Bibliográficamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Family-based interventions are now widely recognized as one of the most effective interventions for preventing adolescent substance use (Foxcroft & Tsertsvadze, 2011). Several studies have demonstrated that intervention effects on parenting practices create benefits to child behaviour problems like aggression, delinquency and substance abuse (Kumpfer & Alvarado, 2003;Forgatch, Patterson & DeGarmo, 2005;Smit, Verdurmen, Monshouwer & Smit, 2008;Pérez et al, 2009). Because family dynamics play a crucial role in the initiation of substance use, several interventions have been developed for parents and families to prevent, delaying or reduce the initiation of alcohol and other drug use.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Negreiros

2013

Ped Soc. Rev Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

participación parental en intervenciones familiares preventivas de toxicodependencias: una revisión bibliográfica empírica [ 39 ] sips -pedagogia social. revista interuniversitaria [1139-1723 (2013) Jorge NegreirosUniversidad de Oporto RESUMEN: El uso y el abuso de drogas son muy habituales en la adolescencia. Los padres desempeñan un importante papel en el consumo de drogas, tanto incitando a su consumo como fomentando la protección y la resiliencia. Las intervenciones familiares han demostrado ser un enfoque beneficioso en la prevención del consumo adolescente y otras conductas problemáticas de la adolescencia. No obstante, los bajos índices de participación representan una importante amenaza a la validez de las intervenciones familiares preventivas. Desde hace tiempo se viene reconociendo que uno de los principales problemas para la realización de intervenciones familiares es la captación, retención y participación de los progenitores. Aparte de esto, se ha visto que una mayor participación de los padres en las formaciones de prevención para progenitores está asociada a un efecto duradero sobre la conducta adolescente. Identificar específicamente lo que determina que la familia se implique y participe en los programas de prevención familiares es de máxima importancia, puesto que la implicación de los padres puede ser un factor de pronóstico de la eficacia del programa. Últi-mamente se ha prestado más atención a entender de qué manera los factores individuales, contextuales y de intervención pueden predecir la participación parental en las intervenciones familiares de prevención de drogodependencias. Los estudios sobre los factores de pronóstico de participación son útiles para identificar a aquellos individuos que hallan en mayor riesgo de abandonar. En este trabajo ofrecemos un repaso de la evolución más reciente de los diversos factores de pronóstico de la participación familiar en programas preventivos de consumo de drogas y otros problemas. A partir de los determinantes específicos y dinámicos de la participación que se estudian en este trabajo, al final proponemos un marco teórico de la participación familiar que presenta cuatro componentes básicos: (1) patrones de interacción familiar; (2) conocimiento y percepciones de los padres sobre los problemas conductuales de los hijos; (3) variables psicológicas de los hijos; y (4) percepciones de los padres sobre la intervención preventiva.PALABRAS CLAVE: Prevención de consumo de drogodependencias, intervención familiar, factores de pronóstico, participación parental.ABSTRACT: Substance use and misuse are very common in adolescence. Parents play an important part in substance use, both through inducing risk or promoting protection and resilience. Family-based interventions have proven to be a useful approach to prevent adolescent substance use and other youth problem behaviors. However, low participation rates are an important threat to the validity of family-based preventive interventions. It has long been recognized that one of the major problems in imp...

show abstract

Family interventions and their effect on adolescent alcohol use in general populations; a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cited by 129 publications

References 47 publications

The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis

The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis

Alcohol Consumption Among Adolescents in Estonia 1994 - 2010

Participación parental en intervenciones familiares para prevenir drogodependencias: una revisión empírica

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About