2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01561.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family functioning in families with a child with Down syndrome: a mixed methods approach

Abstract: This study has implications for the development of programs to support families with a child with Down syndrome and may dispel some of the myths surrounding the impact of intellectual disability on the family.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
74
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
74
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, the positive impact that children with DS have on their families' lives was clearly articulated by participants in this study, as in previous work 19,27,[30][31][32] . Together with data from several studies showing that individuals with DS are happy with their lives and have high self-esteem 33,34 , this undermines the assumption of individual suffering that is foundational to the medical model of disability from which the pursuit of a cure for DS has evolved 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relatedly, the positive impact that children with DS have on their families' lives was clearly articulated by participants in this study, as in previous work 19,27,[30][31][32] . Together with data from several studies showing that individuals with DS are happy with their lives and have high self-esteem 33,34 , this undermines the assumption of individual suffering that is foundational to the medical model of disability from which the pursuit of a cure for DS has evolved 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Together with data from several studies showing that individuals with DS are happy with their lives and have high self-esteem 33,34 , this undermines the assumption of individual suffering that is foundational to the medical model of disability from which the pursuit of a cure for DS has evolved 20 . Though families that include a child with DS face unique challenges, including increased emotional, physical, and financial demands that can have a profound impact on the functioning and well-being of the family 32,35,36 , parents in this study asserted that there should be a focus on changing negative societal attitudes and increasing social infrastructure to properly support individuals with DS and their families, rather than trying to change individuals with DS. This position is solidly in line with the social model of disability, which, in contrast to the medical model, suggests that barriers in society contribute significantly to difficulties experienced by those with DS 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Portanto, a deficiência da criança não parece constituir um empecilho ao ajustamento do casal, conforme apontado pela literatura (Bristol et al, 1988;Carr, 1988;Da Silva, 2011;Povee et al, 2012;Stoneman et al, 2006;Wieland & Baker, 2010). Isso significa que ambos os grupos podem apresentar um ajustamento conjugal bom ou ruim, independentemente de se ter uma criança com deficiência intelectual na família.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…O ajustamento diádico, por sua vez, foi o conceito mais analisado nas pesquisas sobre conjugalidade até meados da década de 90 (Mossman et al, 2006 (Povee et al, 2012). No entanto, os próprios autores destacaram que esse estudo foi realizado com uma amostra australiana, país onde as famílias possuem altos níveis de apoio e tem sido relatada grande satisfação com os serviços prestados a elas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Aliado a esse aspecto, é comum que os papéis exercidos pelos irmãos sejam assimétricos, sendo que o irmão com DT tende a assumir comportamentos diretivos e de supervisão em relação a seu irmão com SD (Pereira-Silva, 2003). Além disso, há evidências de que os irmãos com DT se envolvem, direta e indiretamente, nas atividades de cuidado do irmão com DI, não havendo dados de que eles sejam significativamente prejudicados em suas atividades sociais, lúdicas e escolares (Floyd, Costigan, & Richardson, 2016, Nunes, 2006Povee, Roberts, Bourke, & Leonard, 2012;Shivers, & Dykens, 2017;Stoneman et al, 1991 (Gomes, & Bosa, 2004;Hannah, & Midlarsky, 2005;Petean, & Suguihura, 2005;Soares, Franco, & Carvalho, 2009). Todavia, há investigações anteriores que não encontraram evidências que comprovassem essa diferença (Abramovitch et al, 1987;.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified