1988
DOI: 10.1177/004728758802600401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Decision Making And Tourism Behavior And Attitudes

Abstract: This study examines decision making by families who vacation to Alaska. The three decision-making modes — husband-dominant, wife-dominant, and joint decision making by husband and wife — were compared using sociodemographics, travel behaviors, and attitudes towards the vacation experience. Some differences were observed between the three forms of family vacation decision making. Marketing implications and recom mendations for future research regarding vacation decision making by families are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
1
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
76
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the importance of the family market, relatively little research has been conducted on the social significance of holidays that involve parents and children (Carr, 2011;Schänzel, Smith, & Weaver, 2005). Most family tourism research is concerned with marketing and decision-making processes and roles (Bronner & de Hoog, 2008;Lehto et al, 2009;Nichols & Snepenger, 1988). These provide insights into the social group roles of families useful for the conceptualization of family holiday experiences 6 (Crompton, 1981).…”
Section: The Conceptualisation and Theorisation Of Family Tourism Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the importance of the family market, relatively little research has been conducted on the social significance of holidays that involve parents and children (Carr, 2011;Schänzel, Smith, & Weaver, 2005). Most family tourism research is concerned with marketing and decision-making processes and roles (Bronner & de Hoog, 2008;Lehto et al, 2009;Nichols & Snepenger, 1988). These provide insights into the social group roles of families useful for the conceptualization of family holiday experiences 6 (Crompton, 1981).…”
Section: The Conceptualisation and Theorisation Of Family Tourism Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within tourism literature the decision making process has been widely discussed, focusing on aspects such as attitudes, utility and rationality of decision and the involvement of others (Mottiar & Quinn, 2004;Nichols & Snepenger, 1988;Woodside & MacDonald, 1994). Bieger and Laesser (2004, p368) highlight that sports trips can be complex 'as the potential activities of all travel companions have to be met by a supply in a given destination (maximizing utility for each travel companion)' and that those involved -or affected by the taking of a trip -will influence choices made.…”
Section: Golf Tourist Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, although green consumers make extensive use of personal networks in their information searches in both sectors, this tends to be in the form of family and friends for tourism purchases, but is more likely to be in terms of specialist networks of other green consumers for the purchase of white goods. This reliance on friends and family as a significant reference group in tourism purchase decisions is typical within this sector (see for example Nichols & Snepenger, 1988).…”
Section: Table 5: a Comparison Of The Information Sources Used By Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%