Family caregivers’ involvement in caring for frail older family members using welfare technology: a qualitative study of home care in transition

Abstract

Background Demographic, economic and organisational changes challenge home care services. Increased use of welfare technology and involvement of family members as co-producers of care are political initiatives to meet these challenges. However, these initiatives also involve ethical aspects. Method The aim of this qualitative study was to explore family caregivers’ experience of involvement and possible ethical aspects of caring for frail older family members receiving home care services supported by welfare technology. This study used a qualitative explorative and descriptive design within a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. Sixteen interviews with eighteen family caregivers were conducted. The participants were sons, daughters, siblings and spouses of frail older people receiving home care services with the support of welfare technology. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The COREQ checklist was used. Results The analysis led to five main themes. First, the family caregivers’ experienced caring as meaningful but increasingly demanding concerning the changes in home care services. Second, they experienced a change in relationships, roles, tasks, and responsibilities related to more family involvement and the use of welfare technology. This also challenged their sense of autonomy. However, welfare technology helped them deal with responsibilities, especially safety. The family caregivers requested early involvement, dialogue for care decisions, more cooperation and support from health professionals. Third, the participants experienced that health professionals decided the conditions for co-production without discussion. Their need for information and knowledge about welfare technology were not met. Fourth, the family caregivers felt that the health professionals did not adequately recognise their unique knowledge of the care receiver and did not use this knowledge for customising the welfare technology to the care receiver and their families. Fifth, the family caregivers expressed concern about service and welfare technology inequality in home care services. Conclusions Co-production in the involvement of family caregivers in care is still not an integral part of home care service. Welfare technology was appreciated, but the family caregivers called for early involvement to ensure successful and safe implementation and use. More attention needs to be given to ethical concerns about the change in relations, transfer of tasks and responsibility, and risk of inequality.

Barriers to adherence to home-based pulmonary rehabilitation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Iran: a descriptive qualitative study

“…Meanwhile, there are limited sources of support for these family caregivers in Iran and limited data about their needs 42. Therefore, caregiving to these patients without the collaboration of other family members is almost impossible for the main family caregiver 43. In developed countries, different community-based services are available to reduce the caregiving burden of family caregivers, while the whole caregiving burden in Iran is on family members and main family caregivers may be unable to even have several hours of free time to do their personal affairs.…”

Preparing caregivers for dehospitalization of technology-dependent patients: perspective of Home Care professionals

“…Salienta-se que a relação com o cuidador/familiar, quando bem estabelecida, impulsiona a resultados de saúde satisfatórios no âmbito domiciliar, pela possibilidade maior de inseri-lo na resolução de problemas e compartilhar a responsabilização pelo cuidado (12,17) , constituindo-se em importante ferramenta no processo de transição do cuidado do hospital para o domicilio.…”

“…Ademais, na Atenção Domiciliar, algumas atividades requerem do profissional não só habilidades técnicas, mas, sobretudo, as relacionais, no intuito de promover o vínculo com as famílias; assim como a utilização adequada de recursos educacionais, assistenciais e administrativos apropriados a este contexto (19) . A qualidade do vínculo entre profissionais e cuidadores pode orientar e potencializar a utilização de algumas estratégias de ensino, uma vez que constitui facilitador da articulação entre os atores no diálogo, bem como da interação entre eles, o que é fundamental para o planejamento conjunto do cuidado (12) .…”

“…Nesse contexto, ao mesmo tempo que surge a necessidade de investigar o processo de preparo de cuidadores de pacientes com dependência tecnológica para a desospitalização, a literatura aponta que identificar barreiras e/ou facilitadores a este processo permitem a manutenção ou adaptação das estratégias utilizadas de modo a torná-las mais aplicáveis à prática do cuidado e aos contextos dos diferentes atores envolvidos, ou seja, profissionais e cuidadores (12)(13) . Proporcionam, portanto, melhor assistência e resultados às demandas dos pacientes.…”

Assessing Social Inequalities in Older Family Caregivers’ Frailty Conditions, Comorbidity, and Cognitive Functioning: A Cross-sectional Study

“…However, although frailty conditions negatively affect individuals’ physical, psychological, social, and cognitive factors, the prevalence of frailty conditions and associated factors among older family caregivers in Finland is less investigated. In addition, many recent studies focusing on frailty have assessed physical frailty ( Jiang et al, 2023 ) or family caregivers caring for individuals with frailty ( Ding et al, 2022 ; Glomsås et al, 2022 ).…”