2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familiarity and recollection in Williams syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the conflicting findings in WS regarding recall and recognition are inconclusive. To clarify this issue, Costanzo et al (2013) explored recollection in WS using two paradigms (PDP and associative recognition) to measure recollection objectively. Results of the two experimental tasks showed a reduced contribution of recollection and a preserved contribution of familiarity.…”
Section: Neurodevelopmental Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the conflicting findings in WS regarding recall and recognition are inconclusive. To clarify this issue, Costanzo et al (2013) explored recollection in WS using two paradigms (PDP and associative recognition) to measure recollection objectively. Results of the two experimental tasks showed a reduced contribution of recollection and a preserved contribution of familiarity.…”
Section: Neurodevelopmental Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevailing methodology used to characterize cognitive functioning compares DS subjects, or those with other learning disabilities of genetic origin (e.g., Williams-Beuren and Fragile-X Syndromes) or unknown etiology, to healthy controls of the same “mental age.” The comparison is assumed to provide an index of global level of mental maturation (Edgin et al, 2010b ; Finestack and Abbeduto, 2010 ; Costanzo et al, 2013a ). These approaches are based on the notion that the mental maturation rate in subjects with intellectual disability differs substantially from typically developed subjects of equal chronological age, but should not differ significantly, or only in certain capacities, when matched for their “mental age” (Costanzo et al, 2013b ). Whilst this perspective has been valuable for characterizing the DS cognitive phenotype, it is not useful for determining the gap in cognitive performance between DS subjects and healthy adults, which is the cognitive target we aim for in clinical trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only is the ability to make an association between extracts of information particularly problematic for many individuals with WS (Costanzo, Vicari, & Carlesimo, 2011), it is also a key attribute of episodic memory ability. Long-term episodic memory can be defined as the ability to remember rich details of previously encountered events, which would include not only memory for items but also any accompanying associations and contextual details.…”
Section: Depths Of Memory Processing In Adults With Williams Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%