2014
DOI: 10.14195/1647-8606_57_1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False memories and reaction times: a literature review and experimental data

Abstract: Falsas memórias e tempo de reação: estudo com o procedimento de palavras associadas Falsas memórias e tempo de reação: estudo com o procedimento de palavras associadas • pág. 25-40

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors interpreted this finding as evidence for the proposal that when items produce high levels of interference, as in the case of the DRM critical distracters, cognitive control processes supported by the left dorsolateral PFC are responsible for the maintenance of accuracy (i.e., they prevent false recognition). Sene, Lopes and Rossini (2014), using the Brazilian version of the DRM lists (Stein & Perguer & 2001;Stein et. al, 2006), showed that RTs were significantly increased as a function of test type due to an increase in memory load, and this increase was higher for critical distracters (FMs) with a memorized set of seven words.…”
Section: False Memories In Short-term Tasks: Contributions Of Reactiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These authors interpreted this finding as evidence for the proposal that when items produce high levels of interference, as in the case of the DRM critical distracters, cognitive control processes supported by the left dorsolateral PFC are responsible for the maintenance of accuracy (i.e., they prevent false recognition). Sene, Lopes and Rossini (2014), using the Brazilian version of the DRM lists (Stein & Perguer & 2001;Stein et. al, 2006), showed that RTs were significantly increased as a function of test type due to an increase in memory load, and this increase was higher for critical distracters (FMs) with a memorized set of seven words.…”
Section: False Memories In Short-term Tasks: Contributions Of Reactiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the memorized set of size three to size seven, percentage of false alarms to critical distracters increased eight times! (Sene et al, 2014).…”
Section: False Memories In Short-term Tasks: Contributions Of Reactiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Não houve efeito significativo da carga de memória, embora a taxa de falsos alarmes tenha sido significativa e muito alta, sobretudo para a carga de memória 7. Além disso, Sene et al (2014) sugeriram uma análise dos dados seguindo o raciocínio de DOI: 10.34019/1982DOI: 10.34019/ -1247DOI: 10.34019/ .2020 Lopes, E. J. & Rossini, J. C. 178 Sternberg (1966), em termos de como opera o processo de scanning dos distratores críticos.…”
unclassified