Confabulation 2009
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208913.003.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False memories: A kind of confabulation in non-clinical subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of previous research on confabulation has described it as a clinical spectrum disorder (Fotopoulou, Conway, & Solms, 2007; Hirstein, 2009). Confabulation has also been implicated in (false) memory formation (Bernstein, Laney, Morris, & Loftus, 2005; Loftus & Zanni, 1975), and there are indications that it might be prevalent in typical peoples’ everyday lives (French, Garry, & Loftus, 2009). This possibility is strengthened by the lack of semantic and emotional differences found in CBP contrast analysis between the nonmanipulated and manipulated verbal reports (for detailed analyses of such reports, see Johansson et al, 2005, 2006 and Hall et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of previous research on confabulation has described it as a clinical spectrum disorder (Fotopoulou, Conway, & Solms, 2007; Hirstein, 2009). Confabulation has also been implicated in (false) memory formation (Bernstein, Laney, Morris, & Loftus, 2005; Loftus & Zanni, 1975), and there are indications that it might be prevalent in typical peoples’ everyday lives (French, Garry, & Loftus, 2009). This possibility is strengthened by the lack of semantic and emotional differences found in CBP contrast analysis between the nonmanipulated and manipulated verbal reports (for detailed analyses of such reports, see Johansson et al, 2005, 2006 and Hall et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinction was made between details that were inaccurate, and those that were confabulated. Confabulated details were those that participants fabricated (i.e., they reported something that never actually occurred; consistent with French, Garry, and Loftus [2009] and ). For example, if a participant reported that the subject was holding scissors when there is, in actuality, no scissors present, it counted as a confabulated detail.…”
Section: Analyses Examining Overall Recallsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In this research, we investigated the effect of exposure to false information on later memory reports; the use of false information and the focus on memory errors was a deliberate attempt to maintain experimental control of the processes under investigation. However, the processes underlying memory conformity are likely to be adaptive and to produce outcomes that are typically beneficial by enabling people to absorb extra information from different sources, to extend their knowledge, and to create a shared understanding with other people (French, Garry, & Loftus, 2009;French et al, 2008French et al, , 2011Hardin & Higgins, 1996;Jaeger, Lauris, Selmeczy, & Dobbins, 2011;Meade & Roediger, 2002). Speaking order may play a role in this process by providing an accessible cue that speaks to the likely accuracy of shared information; as a result, people may be better able to monitor shared information, rejecting information when it is unlikely to be accurate and relying on the information when it is likely to be accurate.…”
Section: Processes Underlying Memory Conformitymentioning
confidence: 99%