2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Falls-risk post-stroke: Examining contributions from paretic versus non paretic limbs to unexpected forward gait slips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomechanically, the mediolateral foot position relative to the horizontal location of the CoM WB established at foot-strike is the most important factor affecting the frontal plane whole-body balance during gait (Mackinnon & Winter, 1993). The larger MoS measured on the non-paretic side may indicate that post-stroke participants "overstepped" laterally with their non-paretic foot, to recover from the instability of the paretic side stance phase (Hendrickson et al, 2014;Kajrolkar & Bhatt, 2016;Nott et al, 2014). This "overstep" strategy used to improve dynamic stability could contribute to the observations reported in post-stroke individuals such as reduced walking velocity ( Figure A, supplementary materials), increased time spent on the non-paretic foot (Chen et al, 2005;Melzer et al, 2010;Olney & Richards, 1996;Patterson et al, 2008), increased lateral oscillations (Chen et al, 2005;De Bujanda et al, 2004;Hak et al, 2013;Melzer et al, 2010) and increased fatigability (Kuo, 2001).…”
Section: Post-stroke Participants Increased Dynamic Stability Asymmetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Biomechanically, the mediolateral foot position relative to the horizontal location of the CoM WB established at foot-strike is the most important factor affecting the frontal plane whole-body balance during gait (Mackinnon & Winter, 1993). The larger MoS measured on the non-paretic side may indicate that post-stroke participants "overstepped" laterally with their non-paretic foot, to recover from the instability of the paretic side stance phase (Hendrickson et al, 2014;Kajrolkar & Bhatt, 2016;Nott et al, 2014). This "overstep" strategy used to improve dynamic stability could contribute to the observations reported in post-stroke individuals such as reduced walking velocity ( Figure A, supplementary materials), increased time spent on the non-paretic foot (Chen et al, 2005;Melzer et al, 2010;Olney & Richards, 1996;Patterson et al, 2008), increased lateral oscillations (Chen et al, 2005;De Bujanda et al, 2004;Hak et al, 2013;Melzer et al, 2010) and increased fatigability (Kuo, 2001).…”
Section: Post-stroke Participants Increased Dynamic Stability Asymmetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the consequence of a reduced instability in the non-paretic limb stance phase is a larger lateral balance recovery on the paretic-limb's side during the following double-support phase. Because balance recovery is more difficult for post-stroke individuals than for healthy controls, especially on their paretic limb's side due to their deficits (Kajrolkar & Bhatt, 2016), the locomotor adaptations undertaken by post-stroke participants in dual-tasks (Beyaert et al, 2015;Cockburn et al, 2003;Plummer et al, 2013) may be used to ensure sufficient stability while walking.…”
Section: 2dual-tasking Modulates the Dynamic Stability Strategy Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, individuals with hemiparesis have impairments that affect one side of the body. They may be unable to balance their body weight equally on each foot, and this causes a greater fall risk on the paretic side during whole-body movements (Kajrolkar & Bhatt, 2016). Therefore, prioritizing mediolateral dynamic balance control might have different implications for individuals with hemiparesis compared with healthy individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%