Abstract:Introduction
Despite the high prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse many women suffer in silence, lacking the language and opportunity to describe their condition. There are limited descriptions of women’s experiences with pelvic organ prolapse in the literature. This qualitative study addressed the knowledge and experience of women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 women who had been previously diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse. Transcripts of the intervi… Show more
“…Improved information about potential pelvic floor problems could help better prepare women to manage sPOP following vaginal birth. Sadly, several other studies have shown similar results as ours regarding miscommunication between women with pelvic floor injury and healthcare professionals [11,12,19,20]. Midwives, obstetricians and physiotherapists need to be aware of the discourse on these forums and take part in the dialogue in order to ensure professional support for these women.…”
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major public health problem with a relative high lifetime risk of surgery. The main risk factor for developing POP is vaginal birth. Many women become symptomatic later in life and most of the existing research on symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (sPOP) predominantly concentrates on the effects of the condition on postmenopausal women. However, bothersome symptoms of POP can be reported as early as in women’s 20s and may occur shortly after vaginal birth. Limited studies provide an insight into daily life of fertile women with sPOP. Thus, we aimed to explore fertile women's experiences of symptomatic pelvic organ (sPOP) after vaginal birth. Methods: An inductive, text-driven approach was taken by selecting thread posts from an internet forum written by 33 Swedish fertile women who had experienced sPOP after vaginal birth. Results: The overarching theme “being irreparably damaged” was identified as representing an experience of being disabled by sPOP after vaginal birth. The fertile women experienced that their lives were ruined because of physical and psychological limitations caused by this unexpected, unfamiliar and unexplained condition. Living with sPOP impinged on sexual health, restricted daily and sports activities and affected the women´s ability to fulfill everyday parental duties. This in turn compromised women’s psychological health. In addition, the negligence of healthcare professionals who tended to trivialize and normalize the symptoms led to the belief that there were no sustainable treatments and that women would have to live with bothersome symptoms of POP for rest of their lives. Conclusions: This study found that sPOP had a significant negative impact on fertile women’s lives. The women indicated that they had not had the opportunity to voice their concerns and had not been taken seriously by healthcare professionals. It is of the utmost importance to acknowledge this problem and develop guidelines for prevention and management of sPOP to improve the quality of life for women.
“…Improved information about potential pelvic floor problems could help better prepare women to manage sPOP following vaginal birth. Sadly, several other studies have shown similar results as ours regarding miscommunication between women with pelvic floor injury and healthcare professionals [11,12,19,20]. Midwives, obstetricians and physiotherapists need to be aware of the discourse on these forums and take part in the dialogue in order to ensure professional support for these women.…”
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major public health problem with a relative high lifetime risk of surgery. The main risk factor for developing POP is vaginal birth. Many women become symptomatic later in life and most of the existing research on symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (sPOP) predominantly concentrates on the effects of the condition on postmenopausal women. However, bothersome symptoms of POP can be reported as early as in women’s 20s and may occur shortly after vaginal birth. Limited studies provide an insight into daily life of fertile women with sPOP. Thus, we aimed to explore fertile women's experiences of symptomatic pelvic organ (sPOP) after vaginal birth. Methods: An inductive, text-driven approach was taken by selecting thread posts from an internet forum written by 33 Swedish fertile women who had experienced sPOP after vaginal birth. Results: The overarching theme “being irreparably damaged” was identified as representing an experience of being disabled by sPOP after vaginal birth. The fertile women experienced that their lives were ruined because of physical and psychological limitations caused by this unexpected, unfamiliar and unexplained condition. Living with sPOP impinged on sexual health, restricted daily and sports activities and affected the women´s ability to fulfill everyday parental duties. This in turn compromised women’s psychological health. In addition, the negligence of healthcare professionals who tended to trivialize and normalize the symptoms led to the belief that there were no sustainable treatments and that women would have to live with bothersome symptoms of POP for rest of their lives. Conclusions: This study found that sPOP had a significant negative impact on fertile women’s lives. The women indicated that they had not had the opportunity to voice their concerns and had not been taken seriously by healthcare professionals. It is of the utmost importance to acknowledge this problem and develop guidelines for prevention and management of sPOP to improve the quality of life for women.
“…We included a total of 17 studies that evaluated POPrelated experiences of a total of 497 women by using different methodologies and tools for data collection. The main characteristics of the included studies 4,5,7,8,12,16,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Description Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelvic floor disorders and their impact on women are addressed in different ways and women's awareness of this condition is widely variable. [3][4][5][6] While some women may not seek medical care or wait for several years before seeking medical care for POP, 7,8 some women only disclose relevant information when asked questions directly about their symptoms and their impact on the quality of life, which also appears highly variable. [9][10][11][12][13] The impact on individual patients but also on clinical practice and research is therefore highly variable.…”
Aims
In the current climate of evidence‐based health care, the aim of this meta‐synthesis was to collect and systematically analyse data from primary qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse (POP), to identify patient‐centered perspectives on the natural course of POP. Information acquired in this study may be useful for ongoing research towards the development of core outcome sets (COS) in pelvic floor disorders.
Methods
A CHORUS Working Group performed a standardized search of three different databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus), from inception to October 2019. We selected qualitative studies on women's perspectives on POP that were published in the English language. Three reviewers independently evaluated the quality of eligible papers and highlighted recurrent themes based on patient perspectives.
Results
Eighteen qualitative studies including a total of 497 patients were assessed in this analysis. Our study revealed five superordinate themes, recurrently encountered in qualitative studies on POP: awareness of POP (6 studies), communication (9 studies), treatments (10 studies), effects on quality of life (6 studies), and self‐image (3 studies). Five out of 10 quality criteria were met by all the studies included, based on an assessment performed using the critical appraisal skills program.
Conclusions
This is the first synthesis of qualitative studies that address POP‐related experiences of women, highlighting five superordinate themes, of which treatment was the most commonly reported one. This synthesis' findings may guide quantitative research priorities and will hopefully contribute to the development of a COS for POP.
“…There are common risk factors for POP, including aging, pregnancy, vaginal birth, birth trauma, chronic increases intra-abdominal pressure (obesity, chronic constipation, chronic coughing, repetitive heavy lifting), menopause, estrogen deficiency, genetic factor, prior surgery, myopathy, collagen abnormalities, smoking and lifestyle [3,12,13]. In prior, studies have used of X2, t-test, liner and logistic regression to find relationship between prolapse stage and risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a common condition among women [1,2]. POP can affect the women of all ages and is associated with functional problems of the pelvic floor [3].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.