2019
DOI: 10.1519/jpt.0000000000000129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fall Preventive Exercise With or Without Behavior Change Support for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Short-Term Follow-up

Abstract: In the short-term perspective, there were no benefits of an exercise program with or without MI regarding physical performance, fall self-efficacy, activity level, handgrip strength, adherence to the exercise, and fall frequency in comparison to a control group. However, some small effects occurred within the OEP + MI group, indicating that there may be some possible value in behavioral change support combined with exercise in older adults that requires further evaluation in both short- and long-term studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of autonomy and independence while carrying out activities of daily living and falls are among the top concerns of older adults, because they could lead them to have functional limitations [55,56]. The results of our SLR agree with this, as most of the articles that were selected are related to these two topics, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The loss of autonomy and independence while carrying out activities of daily living and falls are among the top concerns of older adults, because they could lead them to have functional limitations [55,56]. The results of our SLR agree with this, as most of the articles that were selected are related to these two topics, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The mean outcome measures before and after treatment are reported in Table 3. Dynamic balance was assessed in nine studies, using timed up-and-go (TUG) test [35,[37][38][39][40][41], TUG-motor [42], TUGcog [34], or 8 foot up-and-go test [43]. Static balance was evaluated via Berg balance score (BBS) in six studies [34,37,40,41,43,44].…”
Section: Clinical Outcome Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static balance was evaluated via Berg balance score (BBS) in six studies [34,37,40,41,43,44]. Participants' fear of falling was assessed in five studies, using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) [39,45], Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES) [46], Falls Efficacy Scale, Swedish version (FES(S)) [36], and Thai Falls Efficacy Scale (Thai FES-I) [37]. Balance confidence was reported in four studies, using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale [34,35,46] and short-ABC [47].…”
Section: Clinical Outcome Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a long-term follow-up on the same sample that was studied in a 3-month follow-up on fall preventive exercise with or without behavioral support (Arkkukangas et al, 2019). The participants were recruited by PTs or occupational therapists when walking aids were prescribed or by care managers when the older adults applied for home help service.…”
Section: Participants and Recruitment Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%