1990
DOI: 10.1080/08964289.1990.9934589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fall-off in Reporting Life Events: Effects of Life Change, Desirability, and Anticipation

Abstract: The influence of event characteristics on recall was examined by directly comparing fall-off in reporting life events as a function of life change, desirability, and anticipation. We collected information from a sample of 1,669 blue-collar workers on stressful life events that occurred in a 1-year interval before the questionnaire was administered. The results indicated no fall-off in reporting events associated with marked life changes (ie, salient events). In contrast, significant fall-off was observed for e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In one case, the exposure data were collected during face‐to‐face single‐blinded interviews, which could result in recall bias. However, recall bias is unlikely in this situation because salient life events, such as bereavement, are largely immune to this, and it is negligible within 6 months . All data regarding outcome events, that is, stroke, were based on ICD codes from discharge diagnoses or radiological tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one case, the exposure data were collected during face‐to‐face single‐blinded interviews, which could result in recall bias. However, recall bias is unlikely in this situation because salient life events, such as bereavement, are largely immune to this, and it is negligible within 6 months . All data regarding outcome events, that is, stroke, were based on ICD codes from discharge diagnoses or radiological tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of this study is the retrospective nature of its assessment methods. While validity of retrospective reports on childhood experiences has been a focus of several debates [38][39][40][41][42][43], retrospective recall has been shown to correspond well with collateral reports and available archival data [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Gesamtdatensatz enthält N = 2 900 065 Versicherte. Sekundärdaten sind für unsere Fragestellungen besonders gut geeignet, weil weder Erinnerungsfehler [23] noch die Krankheitsschwere der Befragten [24] die Genauigkeit der Daten beeinflussen. Auch die Zusammensetzung der Untersuchungsgruppe ist weder von der Bereitschaft der Therapeuten [10,25,26] noch von der Bereitschaft der Befragten abhängig, an einer Studie teilzunehmen.…”
Section: Datengrundlage Und Methodenunclassified