Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Penataan PKL Sebagai Strategi Penataan Ruang Kota Surakarta

Abstract

<p><em>Hunger and poverty countermeasure was appointed to be the first target in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) global mandate. It is relevant with Indonesia’s condition in the last three years in which the amount of poverty-stricken people grew significantly. To boost the population’s economy to a sustainable level, Solo’s City Government try to give more space to the informal sectors in the city. This policy doesn’t aim to improve the economy quantitatively but also equitably by facilitating the informal sectors, so that they can compete with the formal sectors that are dominated by the “big companies” as in nearly every big city in Indonesia.</em></p><p><em>One of the growing informal sectors is the street vendors. Relocation and stabilization are the two programs run by the Surakarta government to give a better chance for the street vendors to survive the competition with the formal sectors. Hundreds even thousands of street vendors in Solo has been regulated to empower the city’s local economy. The factors that influence the success of the street vendor regulation isn’t only perceived from the city’s aesthetics, which always became the main reason, but also perceived from the quality growth in activity performance after the program has been done to ensure sustainability.</em></p><em>The success of the street vendor regulation must be seen from the street vendor’s perspective. Unique character and street vendor behavior that vary richly must be known to ensure the street vendors can accept the planned program. In order to point out the location character role in the city’s spatial arrangement strategy, the focal point of this research is exploring the factors that influence street vendor regulation adjusting with the needs and demands of street vendors</em>

Upaya Penataan Lingkungan Sosial dan Ekonomi Pedagang Kaki Lima di Kota Surakarta Berdasarkan Tipologi Lokasi Stabilisasi Surakarta

“…Menurut Rahayu & Wulandari (2016), bentuk stabilisasi menjadi preferensi utama dari para PKL di Kota Surakarta yang akan ditata daripada bentuk relokasi. Fakta menunjukan stabilisasi merupakan penataan yang paling sering dilakukan di Kota Surakarta (Rahayu, Werdiningtyas, & Musyawaroh, 2016).…”

Hubungan Karakter Aktivitas Dan Karakter Berlokasi PKL Di Kota Surakarta

“…Di samping itu, sektor informal dapat pula diandalkan untuk menanggulangi masalah kemiskinan di perkotaan. Sektor informal memiliki elastisitas serta ketahanan dimana dapat menampung tenaga kerja yang tidak terserap oleh sektor formal (Rahayu, et al, 2007). Kemampuan sektor informal untuk menutup celah pasar yang tidak terpenuhi oleh sektor formal ini, membentuk hubungan simbiosis mutualisme dengan konsumennya, dimana sektor informal mampu menyediakan kebutuhan dengan harga yang terjangkau bagi masyarakat menengah ke bawah (Rahayu, et.al, 2013).…”

The Need for the Improvement of Street Vendors Management in Public Spaces at Surakarta City

“…The existence of SVs can be identified through the characteristics of activities and locations (Mc Gee & Yeung, 1977). Location characteristic, besides being related to the typical features of location, is also connected with the retailing regulation adjusted based on the condition of location (Rahayu, Werdiningtyas, & Musyawaroh, 2016). The characteristic of activity is associated with a variety of activities which become the bases and are influenced by the location per se such as the types of goods, the types of trading facilities, the scale of consumer or customer service, capital, and income.…”

“…There are two factors or characteristics which should be considered while conducting SVs stabilisation namely the characteristics of SVs location and SVs activity which can be intervened by the government (Werdiningtyas, Rahayu, & Musyawaroh, 2012;Rahayu & Musyawaroh, 2013;Rahayu et al, 2016). The aforementioned characteristics of stabilisation entail 21 components of arrangement, including the size of retail units (P1), retail facilities (P2), retailing activity time (P3), SVs grouping (P4), the strategic value of location (P5), accessibility (P6), retail supporting facilities (P7), parking area (P8), lighting (P9), clean water (P10), waste disposal facilities (P11), the aesthetics of location (P12), the distance to activities center (P13), the level of security (P14), the level of cleanliness/ hygiene (P15), the level of convenience (P16), education/ training from government (P17), legality (P18), agglomeration (P19), retribution (P20), and loan assistance from the government (P21) (Mc Gee &Yeung, 1977;Regional Regulation 3/2008 Surakarta City;Donovan, 2008;Werdiningtyas et al, 2012;Novelia & Sardjito, 2015;Rahayu et al, 2016;Widjajanti, 2016). Among the 21 components of stabilisation arrangement, there are 3 new components, namely retribution, the strategic value of location and the aesthetics of location (Werdiningtyas et al, 2012;Rahayu et al, 2016;Hanifah & Musadun, 2014).…”

“…The aforementioned characteristics of stabilisation entail 21 components of arrangement, including the size of retail units (P1), retail facilities (P2), retailing activity time (P3), SVs grouping (P4), the strategic value of location (P5), accessibility (P6), retail supporting facilities (P7), parking area (P8), lighting (P9), clean water (P10), waste disposal facilities (P11), the aesthetics of location (P12), the distance to activities center (P13), the level of security (P14), the level of cleanliness/ hygiene (P15), the level of convenience (P16), education/ training from government (P17), legality (P18), agglomeration (P19), retribution (P20), and loan assistance from the government (P21) (Mc Gee &Yeung, 1977;Regional Regulation 3/2008 Surakarta City;Donovan, 2008;Werdiningtyas et al, 2012;Novelia & Sardjito, 2015;Rahayu et al, 2016;Widjajanti, 2016). Among the 21 components of stabilisation arrangement, there are 3 new components, namely retribution, the strategic value of location and the aesthetics of location (Werdiningtyas et al, 2012;Rahayu et al, 2016;Hanifah & Musadun, 2014). The new components will be tested for validity in influencing SVs changes, in addition to the 18 other arrangement components.…”