2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faking it: deliberately altered voice pitch and vocal attractiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, it may also be possible to identify more transient dominant states through vocal information. For example, Fraccaro et al (2013) reported that manipulation of voice pitch influences judgments related to dominance. They argued that we may employ strategies to maximize social gain, in that attending to these variable cues when assessing dominance may reduce the likelihood of encountering conflict.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, it may also be possible to identify more transient dominant states through vocal information. For example, Fraccaro et al (2013) reported that manipulation of voice pitch influences judgments related to dominance. They argued that we may employ strategies to maximize social gain, in that attending to these variable cues when assessing dominance may reduce the likelihood of encountering conflict.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The negative correlation may be tentatively explained in terms of mate selection and competition: men with less dominant facial features may need to compensate with more dominant voices, and vice versa. Research by Fraccaro et al (2013) shows that deliberate lowering of pitch in men's voices leads viewers to perceive them as more dominant but not more attractive. This would suggest that this strategy is largely employed for intra-sex competition with less emphasis on mate selection.…”
Section: Intermodal Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar subtle modulation in voices might be expected in courtship contexts. In fact, there is evidence of vocal differences between speech directed towards romantic partners and same-sex friends which can be detected by listeners (Farley, Hughes, & LaFayette, 2013), and intentional voice manipulations make female voices, but not male voices, sound more attractive (Hughes, Mogilski, & Harrison, 2013; see also Fraccaro et al, 2013). Indeed, such modulations occur in other species including frogs (Ryan, 1980), koalas, Phascolarctos cinereus (Charlton, Ellis, Brumm, Nilsson, & Fitch, 2012), fallow deer, Dama dama (Charlton & Reby, 2011), red deer, Cervus elaphus (Reby et al, 2005;Reby, Charlton, Locatelli, & McComb, 2010), and birds.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We note here that while the correlational nature of our findings demonstrate that lowdominance men in the main study demonstrated a stronger preference for feminized voice-pitch (i.e. low dominance men; see Fraccaro et al 2013), these findings are still consistent with the proposed importance of "homophily" in the evolution of cooperation (Riolo et al, 2001) and recent work which suggests that this is a factor in group organization among the Hadza (Apicella et al, 2012). We also note that exploring the role played by different styles of humor within social partnerships, such as aggressive humor controlled for in our analyses, could provide a fruitful line of further enquiry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…"thinness", reviewed in Vaillancourt, 2013), at least in Western cultures. Given that raised voice pitch in women is positively correlated with perceived attractiveness but is negatively correlated with perceived dominance (reviewed in Fraccaro et al, 2013), we have no clear basis with which to predict that differences between women in their phenotypic condition will be correlated with their appreciation of humor delivered by attractive and/or dominant female speakers. Indeed, given that attractiveness is both an important feature of denigration among females and a trait that may afford females a strategic advantage over same-sex rivals for access to mates (see, e.g., Fisher and Cox, 2009;Maner et al, 2009; see also Vaillancourt, 2013 for related discussion),…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%