2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
1
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
2
131
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, CF algorithms transform the prediction problem of user purchasing behaviors into processing of rating prediction problem, and the prediction result highly depends on user rating information for commodities. A large number of the existing research have found that falsity and arbitrariness problems exist in user rating information for commodities [18], which restricts the prediction accuracy of CF algorithms.…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, CF algorithms transform the prediction problem of user purchasing behaviors into processing of rating prediction problem, and the prediction result highly depends on user rating information for commodities. A large number of the existing research have found that falsity and arbitrariness problems exist in user rating information for commodities [18], which restricts the prediction accuracy of CF algorithms.…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLP-LSTM: MLP-LSTM is an online purchasing behavior prediction model proposed in literature [18], where MLP predicts user-purchasing intention by inputting user information and LSTM uses click-stream data to predict the probability for users to leave the website without trading.…”
Section: Comparison Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, CF algorithms transform the prediction problem of user purchasing behaviors into processing of rating prediction problem, and the prediction result highly depends on user rating information for commodities. A large number of the existing researches have found that falsity and arbitrariness problems exist in user rating information for commodities [18], which restricts the prediction accuracy of CF algorithms.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Collaborative Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, CF algorithms transform the prediction problem of user purchasing behaviors into processing of rating prediction problem, and the prediction result highly depends on user rating information for commodities. A large number of the existing researches have found that falsity and arbitrariness problems exist in user rating information for commodities [13] , which restricts the prediction accuracy of CF algorithms.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Collaborative Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N L l    (9) Slicing input data is the key to realizing multi-granularity deep forest. Assume "sliding window" size as   (10) Slice size is lL WW  , and slice number of the whole dataset is: (11) After multi-granularity scanning, the slices of all input data are input into the random forest If there are RF n random forests, the quantity of class vectors generated through "sliding window" sampling is: (13) The final output data size after multi-granularity scanning is: (14) Fig . 9 shows the overall process of cascaded deep forest with three "sliding windows", the sizes of which are d/16, d/8 and d/4, respectively, where d represents feature number.…”
Section: Fig 6 Structural Illustration Of Cascaded Deep Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%