2017
DOI: 10.28945/3656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fair Assessment of Contribution and Process in Student Team Projects

Abstract: This chapter outlines two different methods of peer assessment used in team projects at Newcastle University. One of them requires team agreement, whilst the other allows students to assess each other anonymously. Our results show that students are not convinced about the validity and fairness of either approach, and this illustrates that we need to do more work on teaching them how to assess fairly and to reassure them about the benefits of this form of assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As higher education providers have an obligation to prepare future employees (i.e. students) to meet the demands of the highly competitive knowledge-based work environment (McLaughlin & Daspit, 2016;Pessoa, Miller, & Kaufer, 2014), team-based activities have become common practice in most higher education undergraduate programs (Devlin, Marshall, & Phillips, 2017). This might be because working in a team provides an opportunity for students to learn a greater variety of skills (Hansen, 2016) which include critical reasoning, creative thinking, responsibility, and communication (French & Kavanagh, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As higher education providers have an obligation to prepare future employees (i.e. students) to meet the demands of the highly competitive knowledge-based work environment (McLaughlin & Daspit, 2016;Pessoa, Miller, & Kaufer, 2014), team-based activities have become common practice in most higher education undergraduate programs (Devlin, Marshall, & Phillips, 2017). This might be because working in a team provides an opportunity for students to learn a greater variety of skills (Hansen, 2016) which include critical reasoning, creative thinking, responsibility, and communication (French & Kavanagh, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can rely on the supervising teacher or can be achieved through peer assessment among team members. An insight about the last option is provided by Devlin et al (2016), where two methodologies for peer assessment within a software design PBL are presented, discussed and compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%