2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failures of political decentralization in promoting network governance in the forest sector: Observations from Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of forest ES, calculating the TVES is of great importance in forest governance (Secco et al 2017). Unfortunately, it is often calculated in static terms, ignoring the dynamic nature of stands and the possible impact of disservices and disturbances on ES (e.g., damage to wildlife and storms).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of forest ES, calculating the TVES is of great importance in forest governance (Secco et al 2017). Unfortunately, it is often calculated in static terms, ignoring the dynamic nature of stands and the possible impact of disservices and disturbances on ES (e.g., damage to wildlife and storms).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the plant also represents a vital opportunity [68,69] for the territory of Rieti. It should also be noted that the supply chain supports the agricultural and forestry sector, which currently are in a structural crisis [10,70] in central Italy. The employment effect plays a significant role in the concession process due to the interaction among renewable energy production and agriculture [10,11,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main principles of the new model are the growing importance of civic initiatives, the impact of community residents on the activities of local self-government bodies; transfer of the rights to provide part of public services to non-governmental organizations and businesses; the right of the local government bodies to search for sources of funding for community development from non-governmental organizations and institutions (Balabayeva et al, 2016;De Lima et al, 2018). The experience of the European countries shows that significant progress in the administrative-territorial system and local self-government reform was achieved only where the reformist innovations of the government considered the interests of local communities (Pavliuk et al, 2016;Krat et al, 2016;Shportiuk, 2011;Secco et at., 2017). Among the countries, which can share successful experience in decentralization processes are Sweden, France, Finland, Poland etc.…”
Section: Foreign Experience Of Decentralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%