2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the June 23, 2011 Maden-(Elazığ) earthquake in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, the out-of-plane collapse of unreinforced masonry walls tends to occur at lower intensities than those required to produce collapse or heavy damage for in-plane response. Such fact, well known in the earthquake engineering community, has been convincingly demonstrated in recent earthquakes damage surveys in Italy (Decanini et al 2004;Augenti and Parisi 2010;D'Ayala and Paganoni 2011), Spain (Romão et al 2013), Turkey (Bayraktar et al 2007a;Sayın et al 2013Sayın et al , 2014 or in Pakistan (Maqsood and Schwarz 2010). Figure 1 depicts some examples of damage on traditional unreinforced stone masonry buildings, recorded after the magnitude 6.3 earthquake that struck L'Aquila city centre (central Italy) on the 6th of April 2009.…”
Section: Seismic Performance Of Stone Masonry Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the out-of-plane collapse of unreinforced masonry walls tends to occur at lower intensities than those required to produce collapse or heavy damage for in-plane response. Such fact, well known in the earthquake engineering community, has been convincingly demonstrated in recent earthquakes damage surveys in Italy (Decanini et al 2004;Augenti and Parisi 2010;D'Ayala and Paganoni 2011), Spain (Romão et al 2013), Turkey (Bayraktar et al 2007a;Sayın et al 2013Sayın et al , 2014 or in Pakistan (Maqsood and Schwarz 2010). Figure 1 depicts some examples of damage on traditional unreinforced stone masonry buildings, recorded after the magnitude 6.3 earthquake that struck L'Aquila city centre (central Italy) on the 6th of April 2009.…”
Section: Seismic Performance Of Stone Masonry Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures were constructed according to static loads [2]. Therefore, the structures may be damaged or ruined due to seismic loads [3,4]. Earthquake performances of historical masonry structures must be obtained for carrying to the future and the preserving of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the unsupported length of any load-bearing wall between the bearing wall axes in perpendicular direction of the building plan, the upper limit value is given as 5.5 m for the first seismic zone (TEC, 1975, 1998, 2007) and 7.0 m (TEC, 1975 or even 7.5 m (TEC, 1998(TEC, , 2007 for the other seismic zones. For adobe walls, this value is stated as 4.5 m Fig.…”
Section: Damage Investigation Of the Adobe And Unreinforced Masonry Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of masonry buildings in this region were 10-15 yr old; therefore, it may be assumed that they were built after 1990. According to this time period, in order to better understand the seismic performance of the masonry buildings, three versions of Turkish seismic codes published in , 1998and finally in 2007(TEC, 1975, 1998, 2007 are considered to review. It is clear Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%