2012
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failures in the Detection of HIV p24 Antigen With the Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo Rapid Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the circulation of M + O dual infections and/or mosaic strains including group O fragments could have deleterious consequences. Thus, recombinant forms with a group O envelope (in absence of parental forms) will not be diagnosed by serological tests that are not adapted to this group due to antigenic variability [17, 18, 37], thus enabling silent spreading of these viruses. Moreover, if M + O dual infections and recombinants with group O fragments (particularly in RT) are unknown, unadapted therapeutic management could lead to rapid virological failure of the cART due to the natural resistance of group O to NNRTIs, and subsequently to the emergence of strains resistant to other partner drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the circulation of M + O dual infections and/or mosaic strains including group O fragments could have deleterious consequences. Thus, recombinant forms with a group O envelope (in absence of parental forms) will not be diagnosed by serological tests that are not adapted to this group due to antigenic variability [17, 18, 37], thus enabling silent spreading of these viruses. Moreover, if M + O dual infections and recombinants with group O fragments (particularly in RT) are unknown, unadapted therapeutic management could lead to rapid virological failure of the cART due to the natural resistance of group O to NNRTIs, and subsequently to the emergence of strains resistant to other partner drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor sensitivity of commercial serological tests for HIV-O variants was first noted in 1994 (75,76), as all these tests are based on group M antigens. The addition of group O-specific antigens and development of fourthgeneration enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection tests (combining the detection of p24 antigens and antibodies) have substantially improved the situation (77), but there is still a risk of false-negative HIV-O results (78)(79)(80)(81)(82)(83)(84), because test performance is evaluated by using restricted panels that do not cover the broad antigenic diversity of group O and because specific antigens are lacking in some kits.…”
Section: Hiv-omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the baseline HIV prevalence in the population influences the negative and PPV and needs to be taken into account in the interpretation of HIV RDTs results. On the other hand, it is not certain that the currently available 4 th generation HIV RDTs would perform better based on recent published data showing that the HIV p24 antigen detection component of some 4 th generation RDTs also lacks analytical and diagnostic sensitivity [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%