Abstract:Background: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is an alternative to reverse shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs). The reconstructed capsule acts as a static restraint to prevent superior migration of the humeral head. Traditional SCR uses a fascia lata autograft, which has shown failure at the greater tuberosity. An Achilles tendon–bone allograft has been proposed to improve the failure rate. Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of SCR using an Achilles tendon–bone allogra… Show more
“…However, these satisfactory results run against the findings by Kholinne et al. 24 In a case series of 6 patients, the authors studied the validity of CalATA for superior capsular reconstruction in the management of irreparable massive cuff injuries. The rationale behind the study is based on animal studies 26 , 27 that showed that the healing process at the bone-to-bone interface is more favorable than at the tendon-to-bone interface.…”
“…However, these satisfactory results run against the findings by Kholinne et al. 24 In a case series of 6 patients, the authors studied the validity of CalATA for superior capsular reconstruction in the management of irreparable massive cuff injuries. The rationale behind the study is based on animal studies 26 , 27 that showed that the healing process at the bone-to-bone interface is more favorable than at the tendon-to-bone interface.…”
“…Graft integrity has been shown to be an important independent factor to improve postoperative outcomes after SCR, 22 and graft healing has been proposed to be critical in improving patient outcomes. 39 Ciampi et al 8 demonstrated that mesh augmentation of rotator cuff repair significantly improved the clinical outcomes and reduced the retear rate.…”
Background: Recently, a polypropylene mesh has been introduced and reported to improve clinical outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a fascia lata autograft (FLA). However, mesh-related events such as a foreign body response may trigger inflammation, which might affect graft healing and remodeling. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim was to investigate whether the healing and remodeling of an FLA were affected by the use of a mesh by comparing the signal intensity of an FLA-alone group vs an FLA + Mesh group on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The hypothesis was that the use of a mesh would decrease the MRI signal intensity of FLA during the early postoperative phase. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who had undergone SCR using an FLA with or without a mesh between March 2013 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up MRI was performed at 3 months. A total of 78 patients (24 in the FLA group and 54 in the FLA + Mesh group) with intact grafts were included. Graft remodeling was evaluated by analyzing the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) at the humeral, mid-substance, and glenoid sites. Theoretically, lower SNQ ratios indicate higher strength and better healing of the graft. Results: The mean SNQ was 30.603 (range, 11.790-72.710) in the FLA group and 18.367 (range, 4.464-69.500) in the FLA + Mesh group ( P < .001). Furthermore, significant differences were found between the 2 groups at the humeral and mid-substance sites (37.863 [range, 5.092-81.187] vs 15.512 [range, 1.814-80.869], P < .001; and 29.168 [range, 6.103-73.900] vs 16.878 [range, 2.454-92.416], P = .003; respectively). However, there was no difference between the 2 groups at the glenoid site (25.346 [range, 7.565-86.353] vs 20.354 [range, 3.732-88.468], P = .057). Conclusion: At the 3-month follow-up, the FLA + Mesh group showed a lower MRI signal intensity than the FLA group. The healing and remodeling of an FLA may be enhanced when a mesh is used.
“…As such, we were able to employ our technique, in which we utilized the graft as an augmentation to a rotator cuff repair, with a large surface of contact between the native tendon and the allograft. This technique differs substantially from those of Kholinne et al, 15 who utilized the allograft tendon as an SCR, and Moore et al, 28 who sewed the allograft to the ends of the native rotator cuff tissue. The rotator cuff repair may explain the improved clinical outcomes, as well as the graft integration noted on histology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also studies that have utilized an ATBA for SCR in irreparable rotator cuff tears. 15,16,24 Kholinne et al 15 published a case series of 6 patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in which an ATBA was used for SCR. There was a high graft failure rate at 1 year (83%), and only 50% of the patients had improvements in the ASES scores that met the minimal clinically important difference of 21.0 points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 There has also been growing interest in utilizing the Achilles tendon allograft for superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). 15,16,24 However, there remains a paucity of clinical literature analyzing outcomes of an ATBA for concomitant massive rotator cuff tears and greater tuberosity bone loss.…”
Background: Massive rotator cuff tears associated with greater tuberosity bone loss are challenging to treat. Repairing the rotator cuff without addressing the greater tuberosity deficiency may result in poorer clinical outcomes. Hypothesis: Utilizing an Achilles tendon–bone block allograft to address both the massive rotator cuff tear and greater tuberosity bone loss concurrently can result in improved clinical outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective study of patients treated between January 2011 and December 2018 with Achilles tendon–bone block allograft for massive rotator cuff tears associated with greater tuberosity bone loss. The inclusion criteria were massive rotator cuff tear and bony deficiency of the greater tuberosity; patients with a history of bony metabolism disease, connective tissue disease, and previous surgery to the wrist or elbow of the affected limb were excluded. Range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, Constant score, and Single Numeric Assessment Evaluation score were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Radiographs and ultrasound images were evaluated to assess allograft union and rotator cuff integrity. Results: Five patients (3 male and 2 female; mean age, 54.0 ± 12.2 years) were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 80.6 ± 33.7 months. Preoperative to postoperative values improved significantly on the visual analog scale (from 45.8 ± 25.5 to 14.5 ± 14.1; P = .04), Constant score (from 36.8 ± 7.9 to 73.5 ± 3.1; P < .001), and Single Numeric Assessment Evaluation score (from 42.5 ± 26.3 to 82.5 ± 10.4; P = .04). Forward flexion improved significantly from 53° ± 47° to 149° ± 17° ( P = .03). Four of the 5 patients achieved bony union. One patient required removal of symptomatic hardware at 6 months postoperatively, and 1 patient required revision surgery at 1 year postoperatively because of progressive osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Conclusion: In patients with massive rotator cuff tears and a greater tuberosity bony deficiency, utilizing an Achilles tendon–bone block allograft to restore the bony defect and reinforce the rotator cuff repair was safe and effective. At a minimum of 2 years postoperatively, most patients demonstrated improved clinical outcomes, tendon healing, and graft incorporation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.