2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021wr030559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure Probability Analysis of Levees Affected by Mammal Bioerosion

Abstract: Fully bivariate analysis of peak flow discharge and flood duration is used to describe the hydrologic forcing to levees • Vorogushyn et al.'s unsteady seepage flow model is extended to derive the failure probability of variably disturbed levees • Return period of levee failure due to excessive seepage reduces from 100 to 9 years when the mammal den extends for 84% of levee thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, the explicit consideration of local heterogeneities mainly focused on the study of crack formation in dams (He et al, 2021; Savage et al, 2019) and effect of animal burrows on levee stability. The latter has been recently investigated numerically and experimentally (Balistrocchi et al, 2021; Dassanayake and Mousa, 2020; Onda and Itakura, 1997; Palladino et al, 2020; Saghaee et al, 2017; Taccari, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, the explicit consideration of local heterogeneities mainly focused on the study of crack formation in dams (He et al, 2021; Savage et al, 2019) and effect of animal burrows on levee stability. The latter has been recently investigated numerically and experimentally (Balistrocchi et al, 2021; Dassanayake and Mousa, 2020; Onda and Itakura, 1997; Palladino et al, 2020; Saghaee et al, 2017; Taccari, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in FS (or increase of Pf) in the damaged levee is considered a proof of concept of the risk associated with the presence of cavities, but, in some cases, the assumed failure surface may not be representative of the real conditions. In many studies, for example, Balistrocchi et al (2021), Palladino et al (2020), Taccari (2015), failure is assumed to occur when the phreatic line reaches the landside slope surface. This is the necessary condition for the onset of erosion at the toe or through the levee body which usually progresses more slowly than concentrated erosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focuses on the effect of small and medium-sized cavities, such as those burrowed by mammals, on the stability of the landside slope of levees. Recent studies investigated this issue numerically [5][6][7][8][9][10], conducting seepage analyses eventually coupled with the limit equilibrium method (LEM) to evaluate the factor of safety (FS) of the slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi-dimensional seepage analyses are performed considering idealized geometries and material properties of the cavity. In many cases, e.g., [6,8,10], failure is assumed to occur when the phreatic line reaches the landside. This is the necessary condition for the onset of erosion at the toe or through the levee body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marijnissen et al [3] used an extensive probabilistic method to re-evaluate the multifunctional dikes in the Netherlands considering the society and economy. Balistrocchi et al [4] discussed the advantages of the two methods, i.e., numerical simulations and fragility curves, to study the failure probability analysis of levees. He proposed a model to calculate the failure probability of a mammal bioerosion levee considering the peak flow discharge and flood duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%