“…The therapeutic success of this treatment was claimed to depend on the following conditions: (1) Tumor cells used for vaccination had to be identical in type or in antigenic specificity with the growing tumor (Simmons et al, 1971d;Bekesi et al, 1971Bekesi et al, , 1976, since nonidentical tumor cells were ineffective; (2) The VCN used had to be enzymatically active; injection of tumor cells treated with heat-inactivated VCN or with VCN inhibited by a high concentration of N-acetyl neuraminic acid (NeuAc) or neuraminyllactose did not impair tumor development Bekesi et al, 1972); (3) The tumor mass in the animal had to be as small as possible. Thus, in the tumor models investigated, tumors greater in diameter than 1 cm Simmons et al, 1971;Rios and Simmons, 1972, 1973Ray et al, 1976;Wilson et al, 1974Alley and Snodgrass, 1977Rios and Simmons, 1973Alley and Snodgrass, 1977Miller et al, 1976Egeberg and Jensen, 1974Bekesi et al, 1971LeFever et al, 1976;Killion, 1977Simmons and Rios, 1973Bekesi et al, 1975Sedlacek et al, 1975 Spence et al, 1978;Wilson et al, 1974a Pimm et al, 1978Albright et al, 1975Ghose et al, 1977Jamieson, 1974Froese et al, 1974a Pimm et al, 1978Porwit-Bobr et al, 1974Killion, 1977" Borinskii and Kobrinskii, 1977Math~ et al, 1973Dor6 et al, 1973 a Enhancement of tumor growth after injection of VCN-treated cells tumor immunotherapy with VCN-treated tumor cells; (4) Tumor-bearing animals had to be immunocompetent. Reduction of the tumor mass by surgery , chemotherapy (Bekesi et al, 1974)…”