2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of CFRP airframe sandwich panels under crash-relevant loading conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the validation of the core trigger concept, quasi-static tests were conducted with the only difference of a local modification of the fold pattern for triggering. The experiments confirmed that the position of failure can be controlled by a local weakening of the core compression strength [17]. Additionally an explicit micromodel simulation approach was developed to numerically investigate the panel response under various loading condition [18].…”
Section: The Core Trigger Conceptmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the validation of the core trigger concept, quasi-static tests were conducted with the only difference of a local modification of the fold pattern for triggering. The experiments confirmed that the position of failure can be controlled by a local weakening of the core compression strength [17]. Additionally an explicit micromodel simulation approach was developed to numerically investigate the panel response under various loading condition [18].…”
Section: The Core Trigger Conceptmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For a CFRP fuselage a controlled progressive predefined crash kinematics is seen as necessary to obtain an equivalent crashworthiness. Experiments showed that failure initiation of a twinwalled fuselage panel can be controlled by a local modification of the core pattern [17]. The foldcore pattern used in the studies consists of a zick-zack pattern with additional integrated horizontal edges.…”
Section: The Core Trigger Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations