Failure Analysis-assisted FMEA

Cassanelli, G.; Mura, Giovanna; Fantini, Fausto; Vanzi, Massimo; Plano, Bernard

doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2006.07.072

Cited by 55 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The purpose of the FMEA is to take actions to eliminate or reduce failures, starting with the highest-priority ones. [4] Failure modes and effects analysis also documents current knowledge and actions about the risks of failures, for use in continuous improvement. FMEA is used during design to prevent failures.…”

Section: Tools Support For Fema Failure Modes and Effects Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

An innovated method using Failure mode and effects analysis for improving quality of the software

Sangeetha¹,

Saravanan²

2016

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Comm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a structured prospective risk assessment method that is widely used event logs. FMEA involves a multidisciplinary team mapping out a high-risk process of care, identifying the failures that can occur, and then characterizing each of these in terms of probability of occurrence, severity of effects and detect ability, to give a risk priority number used to identify failures most in need of attention. One might assume that such a widely used tool would have an established evidence base. This paper considers whether or not this is the case, examining the evidence for the reliability and validity of its outputs, the mathematical principles behind the calculation of a risk priority number, and variation in how it is used in practice. In this paper we described a model of FMEA and its failure and also explain various types of tools used in this method.

show abstract

Section: Tools Support For Fema Failure Modes and Effects Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

An innovated method using Failure mode and effects analysis for improving quality of the software

Sangeetha¹,

Saravanan²

2016

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Comm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Layzell and Ledbetter (1998) used FMEA to reduce the risks of failures in the cladding systems. Cassanelli et al (2006) used FMEA for the risk assessment in the design phase of an electric motor control system for vehicle HVAC. FMEA can widely be used in the project risk management.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of worker safety in a pharmaceutical industry using FMEA

Yesmin¹,

Hasin²,

Proma³

2013

msl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Safety is a relative quantity that is a function of the situation in which it is measured. This research has been conducted in a well established pharmaceutical company in Bangladesh practicing GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice), which has a tablet manufacturing facility. Tablet manufacturing comprises a number of manufacturing activities and machineries. Each of these activities, requiring amalgamated interaction of man, machine, equipment and environment has the potential of producing unforeseen hazards. Therefore, analysis of risk to assure worker safety is not only necessary here, it is also important to use an appropriate tool that can incorporate all the risk-producing parameters. The research work conducted here using a very effective tool named Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), consisted of observing the works at different sections, breaking them down into sequential steps, noting the surrounding variables of each task, and using these data to perform risk analysis to find out the most hazardous works for the workers.

show abstract

“…It consists in defining action priority in accordance with the risk level (Tomic, 1993). Cassanelli, Mura, Fantini, Vanzi, and Plano (2006) consider the analysis precision of a risk as a base for FMECA efficiency. They are describing how to update and follow FMECA documents.…”

Section: Risks and Maintenancementioning

confidence: 99%