2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review

Abstract: We reviewed the literature on obstetric failed tracheal intubation from 1970 onwards. The incidence remained unchanged over the period at 2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.2) per 1000 anaesthetics (1 in 390) for obstetric general anaesthesia and 2.3 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.9) per 1000 general anaesthetics (1 in 443) for caesarean section. Maternal mortality from failed intubation was 2.3 (95% CI 0.3 to 8.2) per 100000 general anaesthetics for caesarean section (one death per 90 failed intubations). Maternal deaths occurred from a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
138
3
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
5
138
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We initially performed a comprehensive review of the literature on failed tracheal intubation following rapid sequence induction of obstetric general anaesthesia [9]. Further workstreams included a national OAA survey of lead obstetric anaesthetists to clarify aspects of management of difficult and failed intubation [12], and a secondary analysis of neonatal outcomes from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) obstetric failed tracheal intubation database [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We initially performed a comprehensive review of the literature on failed tracheal intubation following rapid sequence induction of obstetric general anaesthesia [9]. Further workstreams included a national OAA survey of lead obstetric anaesthetists to clarify aspects of management of difficult and failed intubation [12], and a secondary analysis of neonatal outcomes from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) obstetric failed tracheal intubation database [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although maternal safety is a greater priority for the anaesthetist than fetal, women willingly accept some risk to themselves to ensure a good neonatal outcome [46]. Fetal condition is likely to be maintained during a delay in the majority of cases [9]; at caesarean section for fetal bradycardia in one study, there was a significant decline in neonatal pH with increasing bradycardia-delivery interval only in cases with an irreversible cause for the bradycardia, in contrast to those with a potentially reversible or unascertained cause [47]. Irreversible causes include major placental abruption [48], fetal haemorrhage (e.g.…”
Section: Pre-induction Planning and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La evaluación de la vía aérea no siempre predice dificultades, y de hecho dos tercios de los pacientes en esta revisión de Kinsela, fueron reportados sin dificultades en la vía aérea en la evaluación, pero se comportaron como intubaciones difíciles 2 . Tanto como la predicción de dificultad en la intubación traqueal, la facilidad de ventilación con mascarilla facial, inserción de dispositivos supraglóticos y abordaje quirúrco cervical, deben ser considerados, cualquier vía aérea difícil predicta debe ser identificada durante el período antenatal, y un plan específico de manejo, debe ser delineado.…”
Section: Razones Para La Dificultad En La Vía Aéreaunclassified
“…[3][4][5] In this edition of the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, Kinsella et al have written a review of management of failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anesthesia (GA) covering 45 years of published data with analysis of what has/has not changed. 6 The review was initiated as part of the background information that will be used by the UK's Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association (OAA) and Difficult Airway Society (DAS) as they work on a difficult airway algorithm specific to the obstetric patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%