Abstract:Abstract. The quality of a product is the main concern for customers. Hence, the objectives of this research are to determine factor that affect the inline quality inspection and improvement solutions of the quality inspection standard in the production process. Meanwhile, the scopes of the research are studying of all the factors that influence inline quality inspection and techniques to improve quality inspection standard. Hence, interviews had been carried out towards the respondents who work under the Qual… Show more
“…Many researchers point out that inappropriate selection and organization of organoleptic inspection factors can be the reason for significant differences in the efficiency of the production process, and even the reason for its significant reduction [8,32]. In view of this, it is important to skillfully manage and organize the organoleptic inspection process in order to maximize its effectiveness and thus increase production efficiency.…”
Section: Research Problem: Analysis Of the Subject Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative control, inspection performed by humans using their senses, is the subject of many studies of the authors of this article [4][5][6]. This alternative inspection is often referred to as sensory or organoleptic assessment (the term used hereafter) [6][7][8].…”
The article discusses the impact of the organization of the visual inspection process on its effectiveness and on the efficiency of the manufacturing process. The study was conducted in a wood industry production enterprise, using the example of a three-layer floorboard manufacturing process. The study showed a significant difference between two ways of organizing visual inspection in the technological line. The conclusion of the study is to organize organoleptic (also known as sensory) inspection in the line in such a way as to allow the extraction of non-conforming products from the stream, and not the opposite. The recommended method is characterized by higher inspection efficiency, which through a smaller number of type I and type II errors made by controllers translates directly into an increase in production efficiency.
“…Many researchers point out that inappropriate selection and organization of organoleptic inspection factors can be the reason for significant differences in the efficiency of the production process, and even the reason for its significant reduction [8,32]. In view of this, it is important to skillfully manage and organize the organoleptic inspection process in order to maximize its effectiveness and thus increase production efficiency.…”
Section: Research Problem: Analysis Of the Subject Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative control, inspection performed by humans using their senses, is the subject of many studies of the authors of this article [4][5][6]. This alternative inspection is often referred to as sensory or organoleptic assessment (the term used hereafter) [6][7][8].…”
The article discusses the impact of the organization of the visual inspection process on its effectiveness and on the efficiency of the manufacturing process. The study was conducted in a wood industry production enterprise, using the example of a three-layer floorboard manufacturing process. The study showed a significant difference between two ways of organizing visual inspection in the technological line. The conclusion of the study is to organize organoleptic (also known as sensory) inspection in the line in such a way as to allow the extraction of non-conforming products from the stream, and not the opposite. The recommended method is characterized by higher inspection efficiency, which through a smaller number of type I and type II errors made by controllers translates directly into an increase in production efficiency.
“…The goal of Triple Bottom Line (TBL) is to improve financial performance while also measuring the social and environmental effects of the firm for long-term sustainability (Song and Choi, 2018). Thus, certain factors focused on sustainability should be established as a first step for a positive embracing of SSCD in I4.0 (Ngadiman et al. , 2017).…”
PurposeThis study explores the key embrace factors for designing supply chains in Industry 4.0 to improve sustainability practices with respect to the triple bottom line.Design/methodology/approachThe theoretical underpinnings of this study were strengthened by a qualitative method that included an interview process within the framework of a holistic case study. Data collected through 38 remote interviews with representatives of 17 Egyptian companies that are actively using Industry 4.0.FindingsThe thematic analysis identified 6 main categories in addition to 32 economic, environmental, and social key embrace factors. Further, an integrated model was established to show how various key embrace factors can be included in the evaluation of the Supply chain. 64.7% of interviewees affirmed that these factors were deemed to be the most important and influential key factors.Practical implicationsThe global contribution is mainly to facilitate additional eco-friendly initiatives to gain a competitive advantage through environmentally responsible practices, which reflects the strengthening of the sustainable supply chain with the involvement of all the interested parties.Social implicationsThis study expands on previous research papers to underline 20 new global key embrace factors, including 9 social, 7 economic, and 4 environmental key embrace factors.Originality/valueThe Key embrace factors discovered and addressed in this paper provide a unique theoretical guideline to plan and popularize this integration process. The integrated approach assists in the review of existing supply chains or the creation of new ones.
“…It has physical and chemical properties, known as nutrient content, which its quality can be affected by the quality of feedstuff composition. Composite feedstuff is one of the elements causing disability of a product other than machinery and workers (Ngadiman et al 2017). The majority of concentrate feed raw material uses local feedstuff that comparatively has a varied quality and can affect the concentrate quality fluctuated or even incapable meet the standard requirement.…”
The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality of feedstuff as concentrate feed raw material, the quality of feed concentrate, and customer satisfaction toward concentrate quality produced by the cooperative. The parameters observed were nutrient contents (moisture, ash, crude protein, crude fat, and crude fibre) and physical quality (density, bulk density, and compacted bulk density). Farmer satisfaction was measured using customer satisfaction index (CSI) and gap analysis. The data obtained consisted of primary data (nutrient content of feedstuff and physical quality) and secondary data (nutrient content of concentrates) that were then analysed descriptively. Total respondents in the satisfaction analysis were 100 farmers. The results of this study indicated that feedstuff nutrient content varied, even though corn gluten feed (CGF) was in the range of Indonesian National Standards (SNI). The highest density and bulk density were limestone, and the highest compacted bulk density was salt, while the lowest physical quality was coffee chaff. Nutrient content of concentrate complied with SNI except for crude fat content. Meanwhile, the physical quality of the concentrate was still within the normal range. Farmer satisfaction was in the satisfied category with the highest gap values absence of foreign objects.
Key words: concentrate feed, CSI, farmer satisfaction, feedstuff, quality
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.