2017
DOI: 10.18352/ijc.718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that influence the success of conservation programs in communal property areas in Mexico

Abstract: More than half of the natural vegetation in Mexico is managed collectively within common property systems. The appropriation and continuity of government programs related to the conservation of land that is communally used is proposed to depend on the level of organization of the communities and the interaction between the local and governmental institutions, as well as the benefits derived from conservation projects. Patterns of what drives the conservation of common natural resources were analyzed in order t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…food and shelter availability, predation; Barbosa et al, 2008;Polo-Cavia and Gomez-Mestre, 2014;Szymkowiak et al, 2017), and funding (e.g. trained personnel, veterinary care, captive maintenance, monitoring; Ferraro and Pattanayak, 2006;Bunge-Vivier and Martínez-Ballesté, 2017;Green et al, 2018). Thus, the evaluation of such characteristics is important to establish best practice for translocation programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…food and shelter availability, predation; Barbosa et al, 2008;Polo-Cavia and Gomez-Mestre, 2014;Szymkowiak et al, 2017), and funding (e.g. trained personnel, veterinary care, captive maintenance, monitoring; Ferraro and Pattanayak, 2006;Bunge-Vivier and Martínez-Ballesté, 2017;Green et al, 2018). Thus, the evaluation of such characteristics is important to establish best practice for translocation programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ostensibly 'modern' Taiwanese setting, the dominant discourse excludes Indigenous cultures as parts of the present society. However, a resilient local common property resource governance relies on the collective ability to engage rather than subvert diversity in knowledges 8 and cultural experiences (see also Natcher et al 2005;Chaudhary et al 2015;Bunge-Vivier and Martínez-Ballesté 2017;Tadie and Fischer 2017). Just as custodianship of territory by Indigenous peoples was not seen or valued by non-Indigenous colonizers, Indigenous modes of governing the landscape to maintain vital resources were also mostly unperceived and unacknowledged (see also McLean 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feeny et al., 1990), also in Mexico where communally owned coniferous forest had lower deforestation rates (Barsimantov & Kendall, 2012). Other studies instead found no difference between communally and privately owned lands in Mexico, which was attributed to differences in community organization and marginalization (Bunge‐Vivier & Martínez‐Ballesté, 2017; Ellis et al., 2017). These results warrant that the Neoliberal discourse stimulating private ownership may accelerate forest loss in this region, as recently demonstrated for Mexico (Lazos‐Chavero et al., 2021), as well as globally (Davis et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%