2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11301-019-00157-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors leading to unsafe behavior in the twenty first century workplace: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess regulatory alignment, two main approaches have been adopted. The first approach, reactive in nature, investigates the outcomes of the implemented regulations (i.e., the number of accidents and fatalities), and the second approach, which is proactive, considers the assessment of the unsafe behaviors of the drivers, for instance, unlicensed driving, poor driving practices, disregarding the traffic signals and signs, and deliberate deviations from the recommended safe behaviors [17,18]. The first approach has been criticized due to its reactive nature and the fact that it cannot provide early warning information to empower authorities to take action prior to accidents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess regulatory alignment, two main approaches have been adopted. The first approach, reactive in nature, investigates the outcomes of the implemented regulations (i.e., the number of accidents and fatalities), and the second approach, which is proactive, considers the assessment of the unsafe behaviors of the drivers, for instance, unlicensed driving, poor driving practices, disregarding the traffic signals and signs, and deliberate deviations from the recommended safe behaviors [17,18]. The first approach has been criticized due to its reactive nature and the fact that it cannot provide early warning information to empower authorities to take action prior to accidents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They affect the department's bottom line and overall effectiveness in ways that are harder to measure, but nonetheless drag the department down. Dodoo [11] carried out a study to examine the contributory factors to workers' unsafe attitude. After examining 70 empirical study in occupational safety and health research, and thereafter clustered into eight job domains namely: construction, healthcare, informal sector enterprises, manufacturing, mining, energy, agriculture, and multidimensional context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Lehtola et al (2008), even though strict regulations can be imposed on the way workers behave at the workplace, they can still be compelled to perform their duties unsafely because of the restrictions of their workmanship and the working environment. Studies have shown that most of the accidents and injuries that emanate from the workplace can be attributed to unsafe worker behaviours, a reflection of system deficiency and hazardous work environments (Dodoo and Al-Samarraie, 2019;Liao et al, 2017;Fang et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2015;Khosravi et al, 2014). Various descriptions for unsafe behaviour have evolved over the years.…”
Section: Unsafe Behaviour In the Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the International Labour Organization's ( 2001) aim of zero harm in the workplace, Dodoo and Al-Samarraie (2019) recommended that the solutions to unsafe behaviours at the construction site should be of both an employee and organizational type. Liao et al (2017) recommended to management in the construction industry to enhance its image as role models in terms of safety.…”
Section: Violent Behaviour On Construction Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%